Skip to content
Sudonix

Why CSS acts different in Desktop?

Bugs
11 3 2.8k 1
Log in to reply

Related Topics
  • Madchatthewundefined

    Nodebb vs Wordpress vs Other

    General wordpress nodebb woocomerce business
    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    893 Views
    DownPWundefined
    PrestaShop + modules IA https://www.prestashop.com Magento https://developer.adobe.com/open/magento
  • Norradundefined

    What plugins are being used here on Sudonix?

    Solved General nodebb plugins development
    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Roki-Antic Welcome! This site isn’t running Persona, but Harmony - a very heavily customised version at that. Do you have a URL where your site is currently located that is publicly accessible? Feel free to PM this info if you do not want to disclose here. Happy to help with any customisation needs.
  • Pandaundefined

    Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure nodebb
    2
    1
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    DownPWundefined
    Use this code git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x And you will have the latest version without specifying it https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/
  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • phenomlabundefined

    v3 & Harmony diary / thoughts / code snippets

    Announcements harmony v3.beta1 nodebb
    55
    5
    36 Votes
    55 Posts
    20k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of [component="topic/quickreply/container"] However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled [image: 1679077966615-aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png] It will then work [image: 1679077992245-7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png] For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component. The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on
  • crazycellsundefined

    background color of the footer area

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    7
    1
    7 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycellsundefined
    @phenomlab thank you very much
  • JACundefined

    Nodebb Hashtag plugin

    Solved General
    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @jac Great ! I’ll close this off.
  • JACundefined

    WordPress & NodeBB

    Solved WordPress
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @jac That won’t matter. You just redirect at nginx or apache level and it’ll work. The generally accepted standard though is to use a subdomain.