Skip to content
Sudonix

Easier to read code and pre blocks

Announcements
1 1 646
  • phenomlabundefined

    Looking at the pre and code blocks today I realised how difficult they are to read when you switch from light to dark / dark to light mode. Can’t have that ! I’ve now fixed this so that it looks the part when viewed in either mode.

    As code / markup is used extensively here, it’s important we get it right 🙂

    Thought and opinions welcomed…

    Mark – Founder, Phenomlab Ltd
    Executive IT & Security Leadership
    Phenomlab Ltd

    1
Log in to reply

Related Topics
  • phenomlabundefined

    Phenomlab Ltd — a new chapter begins

    Announcements phenomlab businesses smes startup
    9
    14 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW of course. As I mentioned in the first post, Sudonix isn’t going anywhere. It’ll continue to be free as it always has been.
  • phenomlabundefined

    ANNOUCEMENT: New NTFY Server

    Announcements ntfy push alerts
    9
    1
    7 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @crazycells that’s as good a test as any
  • phenomlabundefined

    Threaded chat support for NodeBB

    Let's Build It threaded chat code
    35
    1
    19 Votes
    35 Posts
    9k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW said in Threaded chat support for NodeBB: Better like this : add shadow and border-left on self answer Of course - you style to your own requirements and taste I’ll commit that CSS we discussed yesterday also
  • phenomlabundefined

    New Code Repository

    Announcements code gist github
    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    crazycellsundefined
    @phenomlab very nice and useful idea [image: bravo-xd.gif]
  • phenomlabundefined

    v3 & Harmony diary / thoughts / code snippets

    Announcements harmony v3.beta1 nodebb
    55
    5
    36 Votes
    55 Posts
    15k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of [component="topic/quickreply/container"] However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled [image: 1679077966615-aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png] It will then work [image: 1679077992245-7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png] For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component. The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on
  • phenomlabundefined

    Clustering for NodeBB enabled

    Announcements cluster
    22
    1
    16 Votes
    22 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Madchatthew True. I think this is the reason as to why most Open Source projects are abandoned because they are not sustainable in the long-term.
  • pwsincdundefined

    Detect if user is admin

    General nodebb javascript code
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @pwsincd I think you can use userData.isAdmin = isAdmin; if I’m not mistaken - see https://community.nodebb.org/topic/15128/how-to-hide-whitelist-user-field-only-to-owner-or-admin?_=1648802303112 for an example
  • phenomlabundefined

    Testing out Webdock.io

    Moved Announcements webdock recovery speed
    2
    5
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    Just coming back to this thread for review (as I often do), and it looks like Webdock have increased their available offerings - some are extremely powerful, yet very competitive from the pricing perspective. [image: 1692559685163-7cf9a928-ac21-44fe-99c6-90439030d631-image.png] 10 CPU cores, plus 20Gb RAM? Well worth a look (and the asking price) - there’s also a fixed IP which is hugely beneficial. Clearly, this is well beyond what most people will want to spend - it’s more of an example (but interestingly, Sudonix runs on something not too different from the above). However, not all that glitters is gold - just have a walk through the benchmark report I found below and you’ll see a huge difference between Heztner and Webdock https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/compare/hetzner_vs_webdock That being said, the amount of HTTP requests that Webdock handles in relation to Hetzner is superior - @DownPW you might want to have a look at this - there’s a free 24 hour trial… [image: 1692560710486-5203639b-2f62-47e6-b87b-37580ce5deae-image.png]