Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 28.8k 2
  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.

  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

    @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

  • @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

    @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    
  • @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    

    @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

  • @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

    @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

  • @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

    @cagatay

    Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you :

    topic [component="post/parent"] {
        margin-left: 10px;
    }
    

    aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png

    Maybe @phenomlab have a better way


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • What’s going on with NodeBB?

    Performance nodebb script die
    20
    8 Votes
    20 Posts
    4k Views
    @cagatay The most reliable way to upgrade Node.js on Ubuntu depends on how you originally installed it. Method 1: Using NVM (Recommended) If you already use Node Version Manager (NVM), upgrading is simple. NVM allows you to keep both versions and switch between them if needed. Install Node 22: nvm install 22 Switch to Node 22: nvm use 22 Set it as your default: nvm alias default 22 Verify the change: node -v Method 2: Using NodeSource (PPA) If you installed Node.js via apt using the NodeSource repository, you need to update the repository script to point to the new version. Remove the old NodeSource list (optional but cleaner): sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nodesource.list Download and run the NodeSource setup script for Node 22: curl -fsSL [https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x](https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_22.x) | sudo -E bash - Install/Upgrade Node.js: sudo apt-get install -y nodejs Verify the installation: node -v Method 3: Using the ‘n’ Package If you have npm installed, you can use the n interactive manager. Clear the npm cache: sudo npm cache clean -f Install the ‘n’ helper: sudo npm install -g n Install Node 22: sudo n 22 Update your shell: hash -r Troubleshooting Permission Denied: If you see permission errors using Method 2 or 3, ensure you are using sudo. Path Issues: If node -v still shows version 20 after upgrading via NVM, restart your terminal or run source ~/.bashrc. Conflicts: Avoid mixing these methods. If you switch from apt to nvm, it is best to sudo apt remove nodejs first to avoid path conflicts.
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure nodebb
    2
    1
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    Use this code git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x And you will have the latest version without specifying it https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/
  • Nodebb icon on google page

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    9
    1
    4 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    @Panda It’s been raised multiple times, but only for the open source version, and not hosted.
  • NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Solved Performance socket cloudflare nodebb
    24
    3 Votes
    24 Posts
    12k Views
    Solved. Tuto here and here
  • NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

    Moved Performance nodebb v3 nodebb chat
    47
    11 Votes
    47 Posts
    18k Views
    @DownPW Seems fine.
  • Fresher in Nodebb install

    General nodebb
    24
    15 Votes
    24 Posts
    9k Views
    @Hari I’ve been reading a lot about APO. Looks impressive.
  • Nav Drop-down [Sudonix]

    Moved Bugs
    3
    1
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    @phenomlab said in Nav Drop-down [Sudonix]: @jac Fixed [image: 1638187996641-d2e5410b-fa82-4fc9-a861-7913d3c560ab-image.png] Thanks for reporting. Thanks mate, not a problem .