Skip to content

Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

Solved Customisation
3 2 1.9k 1
  • wrote on last edited by crazycells
    #1

    Hi @phenomlab ,

    In NodeBB, there are many pages containing a list of posts such as bookmarks, upvoted, etc.

    For example:
    https://sudonix.com/user/crazycells/upvoted

    How can I change the height of the boxes containing the post with CSS? I would like to increase the box size, so a bigger part of the post will show as a preview in those lists…

    All those lists contain “posts-list” class…

  • Hi @phenomlab ,

    In NodeBB, there are many pages containing a list of posts such as bookmarks, upvoted, etc.

    For example:
    https://sudonix.com/user/crazycells/upvoted

    How can I change the height of the boxes containing the post with CSS? I would like to increase the box size, so a bigger part of the post will show as a preview in those lists…

    All those lists contain “posts-list” class…

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #2

    @crazycells It’s not so much the height of the boxes that causes the issue here, but more the CSS class overflow: hidden;. You could change that to the below

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        overflow: auto;
    }
    

    This would then give you something like this

    9d3f213c-f4b7-4795-b7de-99689fd07ed4-image.png

    Notice the scrollbar that appears meaning you scan keep the same panel height, but still scroll through the message to be able to read all of it.

    If you wanted the panel height to size with the content, you’d need to do this

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        max-height: none;
        height: auto;
    }
    

    Which in turn would result in this

    569b9c79-eadc-4eb2-ae3b-d612b401f010-image.png

    I’d personally take the overflow: auto; route as this is easier on the eyes. However, you get a balance of the two by setting a higher value for max-height , so

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        max-height: 600px;
    }
    

    This would still require overflow: auto;, but by setting max-height you are able to increase the height of the panel to something more aligned with your requirements, and still be able to read the entire message without having to open it.

    c3ad820c-0cc3-4fee-b099-4cc3466959ce-image.png

    The block of HTML being targeted here is below

    1358ca2c-4d07-4314-bf0c-8ccd1b322941-image.png

  • @crazycells It’s not so much the height of the boxes that causes the issue here, but more the CSS class overflow: hidden;. You could change that to the below

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        overflow: auto;
    }
    

    This would then give you something like this

    9d3f213c-f4b7-4795-b7de-99689fd07ed4-image.png

    Notice the scrollbar that appears meaning you scan keep the same panel height, but still scroll through the message to be able to read all of it.

    If you wanted the panel height to size with the content, you’d need to do this

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        max-height: none;
        height: auto;
    }
    

    Which in turn would result in this

    569b9c79-eadc-4eb2-ae3b-d612b401f010-image.png

    I’d personally take the overflow: auto; route as this is easier on the eyes. However, you get a balance of the two by setting a higher value for max-height , so

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        max-height: 600px;
    }
    

    This would still require overflow: auto;, but by setting max-height you are able to increase the height of the panel to something more aligned with your requirements, and still be able to read the entire message without having to open it.

    c3ad820c-0cc3-4fee-b099-4cc3466959ce-image.png

    The block of HTML being targeted here is below

    1358ca2c-4d07-4314-bf0c-8ccd1b322941-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best 👍

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content {
        overflow: auto;
        max-height: 600px;
    }
    
  • crazycells crazycells has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • NodeBB: Favicon upload issue

    Solved Configure nodebb favicon
    12
    1
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    4k Views
    mventures
    @phenomlab I am on a Mac, so I used the “Option + Command + I”, and then performed the steps. It loaded my favicon! I checked on Firefox which I haven’t used before, and it showed my favicon also! That’s fantastic and thank you for the help!
  • How to fix header side as boxed

    Solved Customisation header boxed sudonix nodebb
    10
    1
    6 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    cagatay
    @phenomlab yes it caused a problem for mobile users. thank you for helping …
  • ineffecient use of space on mobile

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    10
    2
    7 Votes
    10 Posts
    4k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab Thanks
  • is "night mode" shifting the forum several pixels up?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    8
    4 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells hmm. Good point. I actually use my own version of the dark mode plugin, so not entirely sure. However, I think the CSS is probably the same. I’m not at my PC currently but can check and advise later.
  • [NODEBB] Wallpapers BUG on Firefox Mobile ?

    Solved Customisation nodebb wallpaper firefox mobile
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)
  • [NodeBB] First post customization

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    5
    4 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab thanks