NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU
Solved
Performance
-
I don’t think it’s DDOS attack.
Indeed, I am already equipped with anti DDOS musers with crowdsec software. This one did not detect DDOS on the serverOn 2 days ago, we have just two HTTP bad user agent scan on the server but not ddos attack
In fact, for the record, a very reputable illegal site closed with a text file pointing to one of our topics that talked about it. This caused a massive influx of users. We could see it in the number of connections as well as in the numbers of people coming to register permanently.
I don’t really want to undo all the nginx modifications because it’s thanks to this one that the server is stabilized
After if you have tweak against the ddos attack, I really want to know them and apply them
but for me it’s really not that.I’m taking all possible concrete steps but I think the focus should be on optimizing nodeBB too
Actually, we have 758 members online
You can go the server if you want
@DownPW I’ve just started reviewing your
nginx.logand a couple of things immediately stand out for me- Literally all of the IP addresses are within Cloudflare’s subnet ranges. This means that you cannot possibly tell if the traffic is legitimate or not as you do not know what the originating IP addresses are
- The TCP established times are all within seconds of each other but from different IP addresses. This very much lends itself towards the traffic not being organic in my view, but you will never really know the true identity of these connections without first attempting to unpack the TCP headers - see the below
You could temporarily disable Cloudflare on your site to get a quick analysis, then keep an eye on your own DDoS implementation to determine if this traffic is legitimate or not.
The bottom line is this. Don’t be lulled into a false sense of security just because Cloudflare passes the traffic to your site.
-
@DownPW I’ve just started reviewing your
nginx.logand a couple of things immediately stand out for me- Literally all of the IP addresses are within Cloudflare’s subnet ranges. This means that you cannot possibly tell if the traffic is legitimate or not as you do not know what the originating IP addresses are
- The TCP established times are all within seconds of each other but from different IP addresses. This very much lends itself towards the traffic not being organic in my view, but you will never really know the true identity of these connections without first attempting to unpack the TCP headers - see the below
https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200170786-Restoring-original-visitor-IPs
You could temporarily disable Cloudflare on your site to get a quick analysis, then keep an eye on your own DDoS implementation to determine if this traffic is legitimate or not.
The bottom line is this. Don’t be lulled into a false sense of security just because Cloudflare passes the traffic to your site.
I don’t understand all you say.
Finally what we can do ?Actually we have 1.1k users online
We have a lot of inscriptions
-
I don’t understand all you say.
Finally what we can do ?Actually we have 1.1k users online
We have a lot of inscriptions
@phenomlab 362 user inscription in two days and many user on just read forum
-
I don’t understand all you say.
Finally what we can do ?Actually we have 1.1k users online
We have a lot of inscriptions
@DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:
I don’t understand all you say.
Finally what we can do ?My point here is that the traffic, whilst legitimate in the sense that it’s from another site that has closed, could still be nefarious in nature so you should keep your guard up. However, a number of signups can’t be wrong - particularly if they are actually posting content and not performing requests that actually do not pertain to available URL’s on your site.
I see no indication of that, so the comfort level in the sense that it’s legitimate traffic does increase somewhat accompanied by the seemingly legitimate registrations. However, because all the source IP addresses and within the Cloudflare ranges, you have no ability to tell really who they are without performing the steps I outlined in the previous post.
The good news is that your site just got a huge increase in popularity, but with that will always be a need to keep a close eye on activity. It would only take one nefarious actor to potentially bring down your site.
The nginx configuration you’ve applied will indeed alleviate the stress placed on the server but is a double edged sword in the sense that it does make the goalpost much wider in terms of any potential attack.
My advice herein would be to not scale these settings too high. Use sane judgement.
For the NodeBB side, I know they have baked rate limiting into the product but I’m sure you can actually change that behaviour.
Have a look at
/admin/settings/advanced#traffic-managementYou’ll probably need to play with the values here to get a decent balance, but this is where I’d start.
-
@DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:
I don’t understand all you say.
Finally what we can do ?My point here is that the traffic, whilst legitimate in the sense that it’s from another site that has closed, could still be nefarious in nature so you should keep your guard up. However, a number of signups can’t be wrong - particularly if they are actually posting content and not performing requests that actually do not pertain to available URL’s on your site.
I see no indication of that, so the comfort level in the sense that it’s legitimate traffic does increase somewhat accompanied by the seemingly legitimate registrations. However, because all the source IP addresses and within the Cloudflare ranges, you have no ability to tell really who they are without performing the steps I outlined in the previous post.
The good news is that your site just got a huge increase in popularity, but with that will always be a need to keep a close eye on activity. It would only take one nefarious actor to potentially bring down your site.
The nginx configuration you’ve applied will indeed alleviate the stress placed on the server but is a double edged sword in the sense that it does make the goalpost much wider in terms of any potential attack.
My advice herein would be to not scale these settings too high. Use sane judgement.
For the NodeBB side, I know they have baked rate limiting into the product but I’m sure you can actually change that behaviour.
Have a look at
/admin/settings/advanced#traffic-managementYou’ll probably need to play with the values here to get a decent balance, but this is where I’d start.
I think you’re right Mark and that’s why I come here looking for your valuable advice and expertise
Basically, the illegal site that closed was a movie download site A topic was opened on our forum to talk about it and many came looking for answers on why and how.
You’re actually right about the fact that we can’t be sure of anything and there are bot attacks or ddos in the lot of connexions
I activated the under attack mode on Cloudflare as you advised me to see (just now.) and we will see like you said
As you advised, I also reset the default nginx configuration values and removed my nginx modifications specified above.
I would like to take advantage of your expertise, see a hand from you to properly configure nginx for ddos and high traffic. (What precise modifications to specify as well as the precise values.)
-
I think you’re right Mark and that’s why I come here looking for your valuable advice and expertise
Basically, the illegal site that closed was a movie download site A topic was opened on our forum to talk about it and many came looking for answers on why and how.
You’re actually right about the fact that we can’t be sure of anything and there are bot attacks or ddos in the lot of connexions
I activated the under attack mode on Cloudflare as you advised me to see (just now.) and we will see like you said
As you advised, I also reset the default nginx configuration values and removed my nginx modifications specified above.
I would like to take advantage of your expertise, see a hand from you to properly configure nginx for ddos and high traffic. (What precise modifications to specify as well as the precise values.)
@DownPW ok, good. Let’s see what the challenge does to the site traffic. Those whom are legitimate users won’t mind having to perform a one time additional authentication step, but bots of course will simply stumble at this hurdle.
-
@DownPW ok, good. Let’s see what the challenge does to the site traffic. Those whom are legitimate users won’t mind having to perform a one time additional authentication step, but bots of course will simply stumble at this hurdle.
number of user is better (408) but a lot of loose connexion. navigation is hard
-
number of user is better (408) but a lot of loose connexion. navigation is hard
I have chaneg nginx conf with :
worker_rlimit_nofile 70000;
events {
worker_connections 65535;
multi_accept on;
}CF is under attack mode
-
I have chaneg nginx conf with :
worker_rlimit_nofile 70000;
events {
worker_connections 65535;
multi_accept on;
}CF is under attack mode
@DownPW I still have access to your Cloudflare tenant so will have a look shortly.
EDIT: I am in now - personally, I would also enable this (and configure it)
-
@DownPW I still have access to your Cloudflare tenant so will have a look shortly.
EDIT: I am in now - personally, I would also enable this (and configure it)
@phenomlab I have already activate it and add a waf rules for russian country
With this bots settings :
and this settings for ddos protection :
-
@phenomlab I have already activate it and add a waf rules for russian country
With this bots settings :
and this settings for ddos protection :
@DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:
I have already activate it
Are you sure? When I checked your tenant it wasn’t active - it’s from where I took the screenshot
-
@DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:
I have already activate it
Are you sure? When I checked your tenant it wasn’t active - it’s from where I took the screenshot
yep I activate it after
-
yep I activate it after
For your information @phenomlab ,
- I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this :
iptables -I INPUT -s IPADDRESS -j DROP - Activate bot option on CF
- Create contry rules (Russie and China) on CF WAF
- I left under attack mode option activated on CF
- I have just change nginx.conf like this for test (If you have best value, I take it ! ) :
worker_rlimit_nofile 70000; events { worker_connections 65535; multi_accept on; } http { ## # Basic Settings ## limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:10m; limit_conn ddos 100; 100r/s iit’s already a lot !!
and for vhost file :
server { ..... location / { limit_req zone=flood; #Test limit_conn ddos 100; #Test } –> If you have other ideas, I’m interested
–> If you have better values to use in what I modified, please let me know. - I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this :
-
For your information @phenomlab ,
- I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this :
iptables -I INPUT -s IPADDRESS -j DROP - Activate bot option on CF
- Create contry rules (Russie and China) on CF WAF
- I left under attack mode option activated on CF
- I have just change nginx.conf like this for test (If you have best value, I take it ! ) :
worker_rlimit_nofile 70000; events { worker_connections 65535; multi_accept on; } http { ## # Basic Settings ## limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=flood:10m rate=100r/s; limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=ddos:10m; limit_conn ddos 100;100r/s iit’s already a lot !!
and for vhost file :
server { ..... location / { limit_req zone=flood; #Test limit_conn ddos 100; #Test }–> If you have other ideas, I’m interested
–> If you have better values to use in what I modified, please let me know.@DownPW my only preference would be to not set
worker_connectionsso high - I have ban via iptables suspicious ip address find on /etc/nginx/accesss.log and virtualhost access.log like this :
-
Ok so what value do you advise?
-
Ok so what value do you advise?
@DownPW you should base it on the output of
ulimit- see belowWith that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.
-
@DownPW you should base it on the output of
ulimit- see belowWith that high value you run the risk of overwhelming your server.
-
@DownPW And the
worker_processesvalue ? I expect this to be between 1 and 4 ?Author of OGProxy, Swatch, Threaded, Card, and most of Sudonix's bugs…
-
worker_processes auto;PW and WS Spirit alive
-
worker_processes auto;@DownPW ok. You should refer to that some article I previously provided. You can probably set this to a static value.
Author of OGProxy, Swatch, Threaded, Card, and most of Sudonix's bugs…
Did this solution help you?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (ether email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks, use reactions, and upvote to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
RegisterLog in
