Skip to content
Sudonix

error with v3 in browser console

Solved Performance

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • phenomlabundefined

    Repeated application crashes? You might need a Swap file

    Performance
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    702 Views
    No one has replied
  • DownPWundefined

    NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • Pandaundefined

    SEO and Nodebb

    Performance
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    310 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

    However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365

    And also

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164

    It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”.

    Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.

  • Pandaundefined

    build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    212 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • cagatayundefined

    NodeBB v3.0.0-rc.1

    Performance
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    124 Views
    No one has replied
  • phenomlabundefined

    Optimum config for NodeBB under NGINX

    Performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    810 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @crazycells hi - no security reason, or anything specific in this case. However, the nginx.conf I posted was from my Dev environment which uses this port as a way of not interfering with production.

    And yes, I use clustering on this site with three instances.

  • DownPWundefined

    NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance
    69
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    6k Views
    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made

    # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000

    If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice

    https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/

  • phenomlabundefined

    Invalid CSRF on dev install

    Moved Solved Tips
    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @小城风雨多 Looking at the above, it seems you are missing the command to use nodebb for example. Otherwise, you are running the command against the admin database 🙂 Made that mistake myself before…