Skip to content

build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

Solved Performance
2 2 1.2k 1
  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #1

    I saw in the output from ./nodebb build , 2WARNING s:
    Firstly)

    **Entrypoint ... combined size exceeds recommended limit (244 KiB)
    Entrypoints:
    -nodebb (355 KiB)
    -admin (294 KiB)
    

    what does this mean, and is it a problem?

    Secondly)

    WARNING in asset size limit (and listed 4 min.js files)
    
  • I saw in the output from ./nodebb build , 2WARNING s:
    Firstly)

    **Entrypoint ... combined size exceeds recommended limit (244 KiB)
    Entrypoints:
    -nodebb (355 KiB)
    -admin (294 KiB)
    

    what does this mean, and is it a problem?

    Secondly)

    WARNING in asset size limit (and listed 4 min.js files)
    
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • TNG + Nodebb

    General tng genealogy nodebb plugin
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Madchatthew said in TNG + Nodebb: you have to try and use duck tape and super glue to change something to make it do what you want it to do I couldn’t have put that better myself.
  • CSS code customization for the link preview plugin

    Solved Customisation css nodebb
    6
    2
    3 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @kadir-ay-0 marking as resolved based on https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17109/manual-build-a-night-mode-for-harmony/5 Please do not raise requests in two places - here and the NodeBB forums. All this does is create unnecessary load for both parties.
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

    Moved Performance nodebb v3 nodebb chat
    47
    11 Votes
    47 Posts
    21k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW Seems fine.
  • Custom badges

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    103
    2
    49 Votes
    103 Posts
    62k Views
    DownPW
    Perfect
  • Adding fileWrite to nodebb code

    Solved Configure nodebb
    16
    1
    5 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @eveh this might be a question for the NodeBB Devs themselves. In all honesty, I’m not entirely sure without having to research this myself.
  • NodeBB slow after DB recovery

    Solved Performance performance nodebb
    1
    5 Votes
    1 Posts
    972 Views
    No one has replied
  • [NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

    Solved Customisation nodebb css bugfix
    258
    49 Votes
    258 Posts
    173k Views
    cagatay
    mark hi, Refused to apply style from ‘https://efelsefe.com/assets/customfonts/FontAwesome-6-Pro/pro/css/v4-font-face.css’ because its MIME type (‘text/plain’) is not a supported stylesheet MIME type, and strict MIME checking is enabled. I keep getting this error.