Skip to content
Sudonix

NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

Solved Performance
69 3 59.9k 2
  • DownPWundefined DownPW

    OK.

    @phenomlab

    I resume in details.

    1- Stop nodebb
    2- Stop iframely
    3- Stop nginx
    4- Install redis server : sudo apt install redis-server
    5- Change nodebb Config.json file (can you verifiy this synthax please ? nodebb documentation tell “database”: 0 and not “database”: 5 - but maybe it’s just a name and i can use the same as mongo like “database”: nodebb , I moved the port directive) :

    {
    "url": "https://XX-XX.net",
    "secret": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
    "database": "mongo",
   "port": [4567, 4568,4569],
    "mongo": {
        "host": "127.0.0.1",
        "port": "27017",
        "username": "XXXXXXXXXXX",
        "password": "XXXXXXXXXXX",
        "database": "nodebb",
        "uri": ""
    },
    "redis": {
        "host":"127.0.0.1",
        "port":"6379",
        "database": 5
    }
}

    6- Change nginx.conf :

    # add the below block for nodeBB clustering
upstream io_nodes {
    ip_hash;
    server 127.0.0.1:4567;
    server 127.0.0.1:4568;
    server 127.0.0.1:4569;
}

server {
	server_name XX-XX.net www.XX-XX.net;
	listen XX.XX.XX.X;
	listen [XX:XX:XX:XX::];
	root /home/XX-XX/nodebb;
	index index.php index.htm index.html;
	access_log /var/log/virtualmin/XX-XX.net_access_log;
	error_log /var/log/virtualmin/XX-XX.net_error_log;

# add the below block which will force all traffic into the cluster when referenced with @nodebb
    
location @nodebb {
     proxy_pass http://io_nodes;
    }

        location / {
				
		limit_req zone=flood burst=100 nodelay; 
		limit_conn ddos 10; 
		proxy_read_timeout 180; 

                proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
                proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
                proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
                proxy_set_header X-NginX-Proxy true;
               # It's necessary to set @nodebb here so that the clustering works
                proxy_pass @nodebb;
                proxy_redirect off;

                # Socket.IO Support
                proxy_http_version 1.1;
                proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
                proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
        }

	listen XX.XX.XX.XX:XXssl http2;
	listen [XX:XX:XX:XX::]:443 ssl http2;
	ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/virtualmin/166195366750642/ssl.cert;
	ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/virtualmin/166195366750642/ssl.key;
	if ($scheme = http) {
		rewrite ^/(?!.well-known)(.*) "https://XX-XX.net/$1" break;
	}
}

    7- restart redis server systemctl restart redis-server.service
    8- Restart nginx
    9- Restart iframely
    10- Restart nodebb
    11- test configuration

    crazycellsundefined

    @DownPW since you pointed it out, I just remembered. Since we know when this crowd will come and be online on our forum, that particular day, we switch off iframely and all preview plugins. That also helps to open the pages faster.

    0
  • crazycellsundefined crazycells

    @DownPW yes, this is the place to start:

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/scaling/

    crazycellsundefined

    @phenomlab a general but related question. Since opening three ports help, is it possible to increase this number? For example, can we run 5 ports NodeBB at the same time to smooth the web page experience; or is “3” goldilocks number for maximum efficiency?

    0
  • crazycellsundefined crazycells

    @phenomlab a general but related question. Since opening three ports help, is it possible to increase this number? For example, can we run 5 ports NodeBB at the same time to smooth the web page experience; or is “3” goldilocks number for maximum efficiency?

    phenomlabundefined

    @crazycells It’s not necessarily the “Goldilocks” standard - it really depends on the system resources you have available. You could easily extend it as long as you allow for the additional port(s) in the nginx.conf file also.

    Personally, I don’t see the need for more than 3 though.

    Mark Cutting also advises organisations as a Fractional CIO, Fractional CISO and Executive Advisor, helping boards improve technology governance, cyber resilience and executive decision making. Learn more at Gratmore Ltd

    2
  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab

    @crazycells It’s not necessarily the “Goldilocks” standard - it really depends on the system resources you have available. You could easily extend it as long as you allow for the additional port(s) in the nginx.conf file also.

    Personally, I don’t see the need for more than 3 though.

    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    Ok redis is ok now. Thanks for your help 🙂

    I would like know to obtain the connecting clients Real IP on Nginx log.

    I read I have need ngx_http_realip_module for nginx but not active by default but I don’t know if virtualmin have this module enabled.

    PW and WS Spirit alive

    0
  • DownPWundefined DownPW

    @phenomlab

    Ok redis is ok now. Thanks for your help 🙂

    I would like know to obtain the connecting clients Real IP on Nginx log.

    I read I have need ngx_http_realip_module for nginx but not active by default but I don’t know if virtualmin have this module enabled.

    DownPWundefined

    @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @phenomlab

    Ok redis is ok now. Thanks for your help 🙂

    I would like know to obtain the connecting clients Real IP on Nginx log.

    I read I have need ngx_http_realip_modulefor nginx but not active by default but I don’t know if virtualmin have this module enabled.

    EDIT: OK it will be enabled by default on virtualmin :

    nginx -v

    3dbf7d61-b31f-4da3-9715-756c1cdf84dc-image.png

    PW and WS Spirit alive

    0
  • DownPWundefined DownPW

    @DownPW said in NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU:

    @phenomlab

    Ok redis is ok now. Thanks for your help 🙂

    I would like know to obtain the connecting clients Real IP on Nginx log.

    I read I have need ngx_http_realip_modulefor nginx but not active by default but I don’t know if virtualmin have this module enabled.

    EDIT: OK it will be enabled by default on virtualmin :

    nginx -v

    3dbf7d61-b31f-4da3-9715-756c1cdf84dc-image.png

    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    I have activate ngx_http_realip_module on /etc/nginx/nginx.conf on http block like this :

    f7dc6276-6c9b-4a26-9226-63ef8ee080ba-image.png

    It seems to be good for you ?

    PW and WS Spirit alive

    0
  • DownPWundefined DownPW

    @phenomlab

    I have activate ngx_http_realip_module on /etc/nginx/nginx.conf on http block like this :

    f7dc6276-6c9b-4a26-9226-63ef8ee080ba-image.png

    It seems to be good for you ?

    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW yes, that looks fine.

    Mark Cutting also advises organisations as a Fractional CIO, Fractional CISO and Executive Advisor, helping boards improve technology governance, cyber resilience and executive decision making. Learn more at Gratmore Ltd

    1
  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab

    @DownPW yes, that looks fine.

    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    We have sometimes this error, what do you think about it ?

    df42c308-96a7-4811-b63e-663e8fad9a09-image.png

    PW and WS Spirit alive

    0
  • DownPWundefined DownPW

    @phenomlab

    We have sometimes this error, what do you think about it ?

    df42c308-96a7-4811-b63e-663e8fad9a09-image.png

    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW I suspect that’s a failure of the socket server to talk to redis, but the NodeBB Devs would need to confirm.

    Mark Cutting also advises organisations as a Fractional CIO, Fractional CISO and Executive Advisor, helping boards improve technology governance, cyber resilience and executive decision making. Learn more at Gratmore Ltd

    0
  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab

    @DownPW I suspect that’s a failure of the socket server to talk to redis, but the NodeBB Devs would need to confirm.

    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made

    # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn
tcp-backlog 4096 


# I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
#save 900 1
#save 300 10
#save 60 10000

    If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice

    https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/

    PW and WS Spirit alive

    1
  • DownPWundefined DownPW has marked this topic as solved on
Log in to reply

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • Pandaundefined

    SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • cagatayundefined

    NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

    Moved Performance nodebb v3 nodebb chat
    47
    11 Votes
    47 Posts
    20k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW Seems fine.
  • Pandaundefined

    build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance nodebb
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.
  • cagatayundefined

    NodeBB v3.0.0-rc.1

    Performance nodebb v3.0.0
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    680 Views
    No one has replied
  • JACundefined

    Nord VPN & Bitdefender

    Solved Performance nord vpn bitdefender
    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @JAC been working fine. No complaints from me
  • RiekMediaundefined

    nodebb-plugin-customize error

    Solved Customisation
    25
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    16k Views
    RiekMediaundefined
    @phenomlab it work, thanks
  • JACundefined

    WordPress & NodeBB

    Solved WordPress
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @jac That won’t matter. You just redirect at nginx or apache level and it’ll work. The generally accepted standard though is to use a subdomain.