Skip to content

Bootstrap Version

Solved Customisation
8 2 2.7k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So currently nodebb uses bootstrap 3 from what I understand. Is it possible to use a newer version of bootstrap? Or would that just interfere with the rest of the website?

    I have no problem writing custom css, it is just that boot strap is already implemented.

  • So currently nodebb uses bootstrap 3 from what I understand. Is it possible to use a newer version of bootstrap? Or would that just interfere with the rest of the website?

    I have no problem writing custom css, it is just that boot strap is already implemented.

    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    @Madchatthew I think this is going to cause conflicts - not in the sense of JS, but almost definitely CSS. I think it works best to create your own CSS.

  • @Madchatthew I think this is going to cause conflicts - not in the sense of JS, but almost definitely CSS. I think it works best to create your own CSS.

    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    @phenomlab that is what I was thinking. Probably be faster too. I won’t have to search for the right bootstrap code… Haha

  • phenomlab phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @phenomlab that is what I was thinking. Probably be faster too. I won’t have to search for the right bootstrap code… Haha

    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @Madchatthew what are you looking to do by the way ?

  • @Madchatthew what are you looking to do by the way ?

    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @phenomlab oh I was just thinking of using a newer bootstrap to design the blog page and the home page. I can use vanilla css. I just thought that bootstrap is already integrated that it would just be quicker and easier. Bootstrap 3 doesn’t have some of those newer features of course.

    Also by using plain css it will be easier to keep updated and such.

  • @phenomlab oh I was just thinking of using a newer bootstrap to design the blog page and the home page. I can use vanilla css. I just thought that bootstrap is already integrated that it would just be quicker and easier. Bootstrap 3 doesn’t have some of those newer features of course.

    Also by using plain css it will be easier to keep updated and such.

    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @Madchatthew makes sense 👍

  • wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #7

    @Madchatthew just read this

    https://nodebb.org/blog/roadmap-for-2022/

    Screenshot_2022-05-29-13-02-25-42_df198e732186825c8df26e3c5a10d7cd.jpg

    I do recall reading this since time ago but forgot all about it until this recent discussion. It seems that there is an intention to move away from bootstrap 3.

    I don’t think it’ll be as simple as just calling the framework you want without leveraging the newer quoted boilerplates though. Based on this, it would still be a significant effort to introduce a new framework into existing themes without there being conflicts.

  • @Madchatthew just read this

    https://nodebb.org/blog/roadmap-for-2022/

    Screenshot_2022-05-29-13-02-25-42_df198e732186825c8df26e3c5a10d7cd.jpg

    I do recall reading this since time ago but forgot all about it until this recent discussion. It seems that there is an intention to move away from bootstrap 3.

    I don’t think it’ll be as simple as just calling the framework you want without leveraging the newer quoted boilerplates though. Based on this, it would still be a significant effort to introduce a new framework into existing themes without there being conflicts.

    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @phenomlab That will be nice once they have completed that. It will be interesting to see how long that takes. So for now I will use custom css to make it look the way I want. Frameworks just make things a little faster. Thanks @phenomlab


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • CSS code customization for the link preview plugin

    Solved Customisation css nodebb
    6
    2
    3 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @kadir-ay-0 marking as resolved based on https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17109/manual-build-a-night-mode-for-harmony/5 Please do not raise requests in two places - here and the NodeBB forums. All this does is create unnecessary load for both parties.
  • Unable to change icon in NodeBB navigation

    Tips navigation nodebb
    1
    7
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    904 Views
    No one has replied
  • Nodebb 3.2.0

    Bugs nodebb nodebb 3.2.0
    20
    1
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    7k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells yes, I’m aware of that. Need to fix EDIT- fixed. Caused by the same CSS that is used to absolutely position the “verified” group badge in the posts view. Amended this CSS so that is specifically targets the post stream as below li[component="post"] a[href*="/groups/verified"] { position: absolute !important; left: 8px; z-index: 2; margin-top: 1px; border-radius: 999px !important; line-height: 14px; display: block; height: 22px; margin-left: 0px !important; }
  • Why CSS acts different in Desktop?

    Bugs nodebb
    11
    4 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW I’d have to agree with that.
  • 36 Votes
    55 Posts
    31k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of [component="topic/quickreply/container"] However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled [image: aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png] It will then work [image: 7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png] For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component. The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on
  • NodeBB Theme/Skin Switcher

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    38
    7 Votes
    38 Posts
    18k Views
    phenomlab
    @Teemberland great spot ! You should create a PR for that so they can include it in the official repository. Just be aware that any subsequent releases will overwrite your fix without the PR.
  • Rotating homepage icons, gifs?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @eveh It’s not a GIF, no. It’s actually a webp file so made much smaller, and uses keyframes to control the rotation on hover. You can easily make your own though The CSS for that is as below @keyframes rotate180 { from { transform: rotate(0deg); } to { transform: rotate(180deg); } } @keyframes rotate0 { from { transform: rotate(180deg); } to { transform: rotate(0deg); } } Your milage may vary on the CSS below, as it’s custom for Sudonix, but this is the class that is used to control the rotate .header .forum-logo, img.forum-logo.head { max-height: 50px; width: auto; height: 30px; margin-top: 9px; max-width: 150px; min-width: 32px; display: inline-block; animation-name: rotate180, rotate0; animation-duration: 1000ms; animation-delay: 0s, 1000ms; animation-iteration-count: 1; animation-timing-function: linear; transition: transform 1000ms ease-in-out; }
  • Node Version

    Customisation nodebb version
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Madchatthew No issues. Thanks