Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • Forum customisation

    Customisation
    11
    6 Votes
    11 Posts
    200 Views

    Thank you Mark, the changes look fantastic!!

  • navigation menu panel on mobile

    Solved Customisation
    8
    7 Votes
    8 Posts
    441 Views

    @crazycells hmm. That’s odd. I haven’t made any changes from recollection but I could be wrong. I’ll need to check.

    EDIT - very strange. I honestly don’t recall adding the below CSS block to alter the bottom bar, but you’re right…

    .bottombar-nav { padding: 0px !important; }

    I’ve removed this so it reflects stock Harmony.

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    282 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    331 Views
    No one has replied
  • Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

    Solved Customisation
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    291 Views

    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best 👍

    .posts-list .posts-list-item .content { overflow: auto; max-height: 600px; }
  • NodeBB Footer

    Solved Customisation
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views

    @phenomlab said in NodeBB Footer:

    @jac and you. Hope all is well and you recover quickly

    Thanks pal 😁🤝🏻

  • [NodeBB] First post customization

    Solved Customisation
    5
    4 Votes
    5 Posts
    711 Views

    @phenomlab thanks 🙏

  • Iframely (Nodebb)

    Solved Configure
    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    3k Views

    @DownPW This is now resolved. The issue was an incorrect URL specified in the Nodebb plugin. I’ve corrected this, and now it works as intended.