Skip to content
Sudonix

NodeBB: Consent page

Solved Configure
16 3 5.3k 2
Log in to reply

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Madchatthewundefined

    Nodebb vs Wordpress vs Other

    General wordpress nodebb woocomerce business
    4
    5 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    DownPWundefined
    PrestaShop + modules IA https://www.prestashop.com Magento https://developer.adobe.com/open/magento
  • Pandaundefined

    Spam spam spam

    Solved Configure nodebb
    6
    2 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda said in Spam spam spam: ok, yes Ive seen the queue, it shows IP, but doesnt have a field for comments from registrant. It’s not designed for that. It merely serves as a gateway between posts appearing on your form or not. @Panda said in Spam spam spam: It would be better if nodebb had this plugin included in ACP list, as not only then do you know its approved and should work, but many people cant or dont want to use CLI on the server That’s a question for the NodeBB devs but in all honesty you can’t not use the CLI when installing nodebb so to be this isn’t a big deal.
  • Pandaundefined

    www. Infront stops website access?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda because there is no match for the DNS entry specified. The receiving web server parses the headers looking for a destination hostname to match, and anything the web server is unable to resolve will be sent back to the root.
  • Pandaundefined

    Sidebar Widget is no longer on the side!

    Moved Solved General nodebb
    4
    2
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @Panda said in Sidebar Widget is no longer on the side!: Ah, so sidebar wont work on mobile? Correct. If you review the docs on bootstrap, you’ll notice that it is designed on a grid system https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/layout/grid/ What I mean by changing the category is moving it on here to general as you posted it in bugs, when it isn’t.
  • phenomlabundefined

    v3 & Harmony diary / thoughts / code snippets

    Announcements harmony v3.beta1 nodebb
    55
    5
    36 Votes
    55 Posts
    24k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of [component="topic/quickreply/container"] However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled [image: 1679077966615-aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png] It will then work [image: 1679077992245-7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png] For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component. The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on
  • cagatayundefined

    Podcast Share NodeBB

    Solved Configure podcast nodebb
    15
    4 Votes
    15 Posts
    4k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @cagatay You could experiment with nodebb-plugin-ns-embed but I expect the x-origin tag on the remote site to prevent playback.
  • crazycellsundefined

    creating topic specific widgets

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    16
    10 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @crazycells said in creating topic specific widgets: Additionally if hide class exists, why are we re-defining it? We’re not 🤭 I misspelled it - it should be hidden
  • DownPWundefined

    [NODEBB] Wallpapers BUG on Firefox Mobile ?

    Solved Customisation nodebb wallpaper firefox mobile
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)