Skip to content
Sudonix

Want to use Sudonix themes ?

Chitchat

Related Topics
  • phenomlabundefined

    Who uses Flarum?

    Chitchat
    22
    7 Votes
    22 Posts
    294 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Madchatthew I use it here. It is faster, but not sure if that extends to build times.

  • phenomlabundefined

    Threaded post support for NodeBB

    Let's Build It
    146
    50 Votes
    146 Posts
    21k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    Updated git for above change

    https://github.com/phenomlab/nodebb-harmony-threading/commit/14a4e277521d83d219065ffb14154fd5f5cfac69

  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    282 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • phenomlabundefined

    Unable to change icon in NodeBB navigation

    Tips
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    208 Views
    No one has replied
  • cagatayundefined

    who is read NodeBB

    Customisation
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    632 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @cagatay You should ask in the NodeBB forums. Perhaps reference this post

    https://discuss.flarum.org/d/23066-who-read

  • cagatayundefined

    Podcast Share NodeBB

    Solved Configure
    15
    4 Votes
    15 Posts
    690 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @cagatay You could experiment with nodebb-plugin-ns-embed but I expect the x-origin tag on the remote site to prevent playback.

  • qwinterundefined

    Using nodebb as a publishing destination, posting after git push?

    General
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    494 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @qwinter this particular site uses the code I wrote if you want to see it in action. It’s a information and intelligence gatherer I designed for collecting various information security articles from around the globe and consolidating them in one place.

    Essentially, each “post” is in fact generated by the script, and the NodeBB API.

    https://hostrisk.com/

  • Hariundefined

    unable to upvote on forum

    Solved Performance
    10
    3 Votes
    10 Posts
    719 Views
    Hariundefined

    @phenomlab yes, i can understand. it is working now 🙂