Skip to content
Sudonix

Want to use Sudonix themes ?

Chitchat

Related Topics
  • phenomlabundefined

    Who uses Flarum?

    Chitchat
    22
    7 Votes
    22 Posts
    294 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Madchatthew I use it here. It is faster, but not sure if that extends to build times.

  • phenomlabundefined

    Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!

    Announcements
    16
    15 Votes
    16 Posts
    174 Views
    JACundefined

    @phenomlab of course, to be recognised is fantastic.

    @phenomlab said in Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!:

    Sadly, no. Web crawlers and scrapers are often JS based and read text only, so styles don’t have any bearing.

    I’ve read mixed things about this, but no that does make sense, it was something I read a many years back when using Wordpress.

  • DownPWundefined

    Block Domain

    Solved Let's Build It
    26
    1 Votes
    26 Posts
    2k Views
    DownPWundefined

    Yes ogproxy too is functionnal on dev

  • Pandaundefined

    Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    199 Views
    DownPWundefined

    Use this code

    git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x

    And you will have the latest version without specifying it

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/

  • phenomlabundefined

    Swatch / Theme Changer

    Code Respository
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @veronikya it might flicker on load, yes, and that’s normal. It’s because the CSS and JS are loaded before the custom elements, but it shouldn’t be too bad on reasonable links.

    It shouldn’t flicker at all navigating through the site though as the CSS and JS are already loaded.

  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    282 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • cagatayundefined

    Upgrade Problem from 2.8.3 to 2.8.4

    Solved Configure
    35
    8 Votes
    35 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @cagatay No, you can ignore that.

  • JACundefined

    Nodebb Hashtag plugin

    Solved General
    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    937 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @jac Great ! I’ll close this off.