Skip to content

Custom badges

Solved Customisation

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • Forum customisation

    Customisation
    11
    6 Votes
    11 Posts
    250 Views

    Thank you Mark, the changes look fantastic!!

  • CSS code customization for the link preview plugin

    Solved Customisation
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    612 Views

    @crazycells said in CSS code customization for the link preview plugin:

    does OGProxy show the pdf previews as well?

    Not yet, but it could with a bit of additional code.

  • how to hide "moved" badge with CSS?

    Solved Customisation
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    517 Views

    @crazycells ah, I see. That makes sense.

  • www. Infront stops website access?

    Solved Configure
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    473 Views

    @Panda because there is no match for the DNS entry specified. The receiving web server parses the headers looking for a destination hostname to match, and anything the web server is unable to resolve will be sent back to the root.

  • nodebb-plugin-custom-pages

    Solved Customisation
    5
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    623 Views

    @DownPW it’s possible, yes, but you may inadvertently end up targeting other elements using the same class which of course isn’t desired.

    Can you provide a link in DM for me to review?

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    293 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • [NodeBB] Custom fields plugin

    Unsolved Customisation
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    925 Views

    @pwsincd hi. Just following up on this thread (I know it’s old) but was curious to understand if it’s still an issue or not ?

  • [NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

    Solved Customisation
    199
    39 Votes
    199 Posts
    33k Views

    I will test ASAP

    Many thanks my friend