@Hari no problems. I hear you - totally. I’m not going to turn this into a Flarum bashing exercise, but I landed up with almost the same experience when I raised similar concerns around there not being any suitable GDPR extensions - yet Blomstra is based in Europe, and that’s the same region as to where they are marketing the “commercial” version of Flarum.
I received something of a backlash when I made the point around Flarum not being GDPR ready or compliant. I’m an information technology and security expert by trade and yet some other members suddenly decided they were experts in the subject matter, and decided to refute my claims by posting links to pointless websites that also had very little idea of what an adequate GDPR framework should look like. In fact, the tone of the discussion deteriorated to the point where my views were almost being discredited - in other words, quite toxic, and not something i wanted to be a part of anymore.
Getting back to the SEO side of things, I’ve never considered this to be adequate in Flarum. It’s written and developed by someone with no real fundamental understanding of SEO best practices. If you compare to NodeBB (who absolutely do this properly and it’s part of core) you’ll find you in fact are missing out on traffic when it needn’t be that way. My traffic stats have gone though the roof since moving to NodeBB, and I’m not doing anything differently either.
I used Flarum for two projects - both of which failed in terms of traction. Sudonix (as you know) is based on NodeBB, and there really is no comparison between the two platforms.
Flarum is a gold digger, i mean the whole eco system.
Totally agree, and it’ll only get worse once Blomstra takes hold.