Skip to content

Want to use Sudonix themes ?

Chitchat

Related Topics
  • Who uses Flarum?

    Chitchat
    22
    7 Votes
    22 Posts
    392 Views

    @Madchatthew I use it here. It is faster, but not sure if that extends to build times.

  • NodeBB recent cards customisation

    Solved Customisation
    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    114 Views

    @phenomlab thank you very much for the assistance Mark, massively appreciated as always.

    The great thing about this is it’s all documented for other NodeBB users that come looking for solutions 😃.

    Looks far better 🤝👍🏻.

  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    329 Views

    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

    However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365

    And also

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164

    It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”.

    Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.

  • Composer options on nodebb

    Solved Configure
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    430 Views

    @Panda You should be able to expose the CSS for these using F12 to get into console

    3591518c-e3a3-4ada-a43c-6b32a5e0359c-image.png

    a2b8ed46-4157-4ff2-85f0-576543380107-image.png

    That should then expose the element once selected

    89d9c545-a47a-40d1-98f4-80cf3b958e8f-image.png

    Here’s the below CSS you need based on the screenshot provided.

    .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="picture-o"], .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="spoiler"] { display: none; }
  • Further Widgets question

    Solved Configure
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    235 Views

    @Panda category is for a category in its own, so for example, “fruit” whereas categories is the page that contains all categories as a list.

  • Fresher in Nodebb install

    General
    24
    15 Votes
    24 Posts
    2k Views

    @Hari I’ve been reading a lot about APO. Looks impressive.

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    934 Views

    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)

  • Iframely (Nodebb)

    Solved Configure
    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    3k Views

    @DownPW This is now resolved. The issue was an incorrect URL specified in the Nodebb plugin. I’ve corrected this, and now it works as intended.