Skip to content

Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads

Privacy
  • @phenomlab said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    Love this analogy - sounds very much like the manifesto of Ted Kaczynski

    Thanks, that is always what I think when someone goes off on someone else online trying to force everyone to think the same as them.

    @phenomlab said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    Yes, and as I often say to people - “you can think what you like, but knowing when NOT to say it is a skill in itself”. Essentially, keep your views and opinions to yourself, and don’t force your diatribe on others who likely won’t appreciate it anyway.

    Yes, 100%

  • So kind of along the lines of not allowing big tech to steal your private data, I realized that I was using gboard on my phone. A light bulb flashed in my head, what a better way to get every keystroke that you use when type, searching, putting in passwords and all of that. So realizing that, I did some searching and reading some reddits and found HeliBoard, which does not do those things. I have F-Droid installed on my phone and installed it from there. So far I like it and it also has some of the features that gboard has.

    I also decided to go with signal. And to get family to change to it isn’t so easy. My mom did, but my brother is taking his sweet ole time. He said he installed it but he hasn’t signed up for it yet. So we will see.

  • @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    I realized that I was using gboard on my phone. A light bulb flashed in my head, what a better way to get every keystroke that you use when type, searching, putting in passwords and all of that.

    Yes, that’s something I too realised a while back. The the same reason, if you use a custom keyboard with an iPhone, it always forces reversion to the stock keyboard as soon as you enter anything sensitive, such as passwords or payment details

    @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    And to get family to change to it isn’t so easy

    That’s never easy. Good luck!

  • @phenomlab Sneaky iphone. One of the many reasons why i don’t like iphone. To proprietery and they only want you to use their stuff.

    Thanks, we will see if they do. They don’t seem to care about that stuff and are like whatever, so we will see.

  • @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    Sneaky iphone. One of the many reasons why i don’t like iphone. To proprietery and they only want you to use their stuff.

    Whilst I do see the benefit from the security angle, I think the choice of keyboard should be a user based one. Yes, of course, display a warning - an icon that shows more detail when tapped, and offers you a choice, but forcing the change with zero choice is a bridge too far in my view.

  • @phenomlab What keyboard do you use on your current phone right now?

  • @Madchatthew I’m using the stock Samsung keyboard from OneUI

  • @phenomlab Right on! I think I am liking the keyboard I mentioned above. Don’t like the look of it when you turn the phone sideways thought, but I have to look and see if there is a way to change that when you turn the phone sideways.

  • @Madchatthew I honestly don’t use the phone sideways so no issue as such for me 😀

  • @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    I also decided to go with signal. And to get family to change to it isn’t so easy. My mom did, but my brother is taking his sweet ole time. He said he installed it but he hasn’t signed up for it yet. So we will see.

    I recently made the switch to signal like yourself.

    Thought this may be of interest to you especially getting the family to move over.

    https://www.makeuseof.com/signal-rolls-out-video-call-links/

  • @JAC @Madchatthew this is probably also useful - essentially, my views on usage

    1. Privacy Concerns
      Data Sharing with Meta (Facebook): WhatsApp shares some user data with its parent company, Meta, which uses this information for targeted advertising across its platform. Although the messages are end-to-end encrypted, metadata like who you talk to, how often, and for how long can still be used to build a profile.
      Policy Changes: WhatsApp’s privacy policy has been updated multiple times, sparking concerns that future changes might further encroach on user privacy.
    2. End-to-End Encryption Limitations
      Metadata Collection: While messages are encrypted, WhatsApp still collects metadata on user activity. This can potentially allow for profiling and activity tracking, albeit in a non-content-specific way.
      Backups: Messages backed up to cloud services (like Google Drive or iCloud) aren’t end-to-end encrypted by WhatsApp, meaning they are vulnerable to third-party access or hacking.
    3. Lack of Customization and Features
      Feature Limitations: Competing apps such as Telegram and Signal offer more customization, like unique themes, larger group capacities, and more advanced media sharing.
      Restrictions on Group Size: WhatsApp group limits are smaller compared to alternatives like Telegram, which can host much larger communities.
    4. Platform Monopolization and Dependency
      Heavy Market Influence: WhatsApp’s widespread usage can create a dependency on Meta’s ecosystem, reducing users’ exposure to more privacy-oriented platforms.
      Reduced Competition: This dominance limits market space for alternative messaging services, leading to fewer options and less innovation outside the Meta ecosystem.
    5. Security Concerns
      Potential Vulnerabilities: Despite robust security measures, WhatsApp has experienced vulnerabilities and hacking incidents, which can be unsettling for security-focused users.
      Third-Party Integration Risks: WhatsApp’s growing integration with other Meta services raises concerns that security vulnerabilities from one platform could impact another.
    6. Data Sovereignty
      Control Over Data: WhatsApp users don’t have full control over their data and cannot self-host as they could with other messaging solutions like Matrix or XMPP-based services.
    7. Lack of Cross-Platform Support
      Device Limitations: WhatsApp has been slower to roll out multi-device support compared to competitors, limiting access across devices. Although it has now been expanded, it’s still limited compared to other apps like Telegram.
      Alternative Messaging Apps
      Signal: Highly regarded for its focus on privacy and transparency; it’s open-source and designed with minimal metadata collection.
      Telegram: Known for its features, such as large groups and extensive media options, although it’s not as privacy-focused as Signal.
      Matrix/Element: Decentralized, self-hostable, and offers excellent data control.

    Ultimately, whether to keep using WhatsApp depends on your priorities for security, privacy, and functionality.

  • @JAC Nice, that would be nice to have video calls encrypted.

    @phenomlab nice thanks for that post.

    Update - so far my wife is basically no i don’t want to install that and change apps if everyone else has to change to that app too. So it seems she pretty much doesn’t care about privacy.

    My mom is the only one that has installed it and used it LOL - But her and my dad are all about privacy and such. It doesn’t do much good though if others don’t join it.

    I do wish that signal would add sms and if someone switches to signal then it would use the secure feature. But that would probably go against what they are all about.

  • @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    But her and my dad are all about privacy and such. It doesn’t do much good though if others don’t join it.

    But even that statement itself is like a breath of fresh air. Typically the generation before are the most difficult to educate but it seems your parents are a step ahead of everyone else.

  • @Madchatthew said in Facebook fined for forcing users to agree to personalised ads:

    I do wish that signal would add sms and if someone switches to signal then it would use the secure feature. But that would probably go against what they are all about.

    Yes, same here. Perhaps one day…


Related Topics
  • 7 Votes
    12 Posts
    78 Views

    @DownPW this looks interesting! 😬😬.

  • 2 Votes
    4 Posts
    226 Views

    @DownPW This won’t be the first time that Amazon and others like them are being bought to account. I recall seeing a documentary on the TV recently where they sent in a reporter with secret cameras to film the strict regimen and constant threat of being fired for not meeting targets that workers are placed under.

    The surveillance just takes this to a whole new level in my view and it’s like being placed under a microscope for constant scrutiny. This goes well beyond the surveillance placed on prisoners!

  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    668 Views

    @DownPW 🙂 most of this really depends on your desired security model. In all cases with firewalls, less is always more, although it’s never as clear cut as that, and there are always bespoke ports you’ll need to open periodically.

    Heztner’s DDoS protection is superior, and I know they have invested a lot of time, effort, and money into making it extremely effective. However, if you consider that the largest ever DDoS attack hit Cloudflare at 71m rps (and they were able to deflect it), and each attack can last anywhere between 8-24 hours which really depends on how determined the attacker(s) is/are, you can never be fully prepared - nor can you trace it’s true origin.

    DDoS attacks by their nature (Distributed Denial of Service) are conducted by large numbers of devices whom have become part of a “bot army” - and in most cases, the owners of these devices are blissfully unaware that they have been attacked and are under command and control from a nefarious resource. Given that the attacks originate from multiple sources, this allows the real attacker to observe from a distance whilst concealing their own identity and origin in the process.

    If you consider the desired effect of DDoS, it is not an attempt to access ports that are typically closed, but to flood (and eventually overwhelm) the target (such as a website) with millions of requests per second in an attempt to force it offline. Victims of DDoS attacks are often financial services for example, with either extortion or financial gain being the primary objective - in other words, pay for the originator to stop the attack.

    It’s even possible to get DDoS as a service these days - with a credit card, a few clicks of a mouse and a target IP, you can have your own proxy campaign running in minutes which typically involves “booters” or “stressers” - see below for more

    https://heimdalsecurity.com/blog/ddos-as-a-service-attacks-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work

    @DownPW said in Setting for high load and prevent DDoS (sysctl, iptables, crowdsec or other):

    in short if you have any advice to give to secure the best.

    It’s not just about DDos or firewalls. There are a number of vulnerabilities on all systems that if not patched, will expose that same system to exploit. One of my favourite online testers which does a lot more than most basic ones is below

    https://www.immuniweb.com/websec/

    I’d start with the findings reported here and use that to branch outwards.

  • 4 Votes
    4 Posts
    308 Views

    @phenomlab said in TikTok fined £12.7m for misusing children’s data:

    Just another reason not to use TikTok. Zero privacy, Zero respect for privacy, and Zero controls in place.

    https://news.sky.com/story/tiktok-fined-12-7m-for-data-protection-breaches-12849702

    The quote from this article says it all

    TikTok should have known better. TikTok should have done better

    They should have, but didn’t. Clearly the same distinct lack of core values as Facebook. Profit first, privacy… well, maybe.

    Wow, that’s crazy! so glad I stayed away from it, rotten to the core.

  • 3 Votes
    4 Posts
    567 Views

    @DownPW yeah, I seem to spend a large amount of my time trying to educate people that there’s no silver bullet when it comes to security.

  • Crowdsec: a replacement for Fail2ban

    Security
    3
    4 Votes
    3 Posts
    913 Views

    @phenomlab

    No they have a free and pro console instance.
    We can see alert with IP, Source AS, scenario attack etc…

    Installation on the NODEBB server without problems. Very good tools

    cf7e5a89-84f4-435b-82eb-434c0bfc895e-image.png
    cc82a10e-a1f1-4fd8-a433-7c9b2d31f254-image.png

    1b7147b0-37c6-4d87-b4f1-a0fe92e74afd-image.png

    7c21fc10-1825-48e1-a993-92b84455f074-image.png


    We can also do research on IPs via the crowdsec analyzer

    I believe it’s 500 per month in the Free version

    43bc8265-a57c-4439-829c-0bb8602d99b4-image.png

  • 6 Votes
    28 Posts
    2k Views

    @gotwf Great analogy 🙂

  • is my DMARC configured correctly?

    Solved Configure
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    466 Views

    @phenomlab said in is my DMARC configured correctly?:

    you’ll get one from every domain that receives email from yours.

    Today I have received another mail from outlook DMARC, i was referring to your reply again and found it very helpful/informative. thanks again.

    I wish sudonix 100 more great years ahead!