Skip to content
Sudonix

Securing your webserver against common attacks

Blog
1 1 555 1
  • phenomlabundefined

    1622031373927-headers-min.webp

    It surprises me (well, actually, dismays me in most cases) that new websites appear online all the time who have clearly spent an inordinate amount of time on cosmetics / appearance, and decent hosting, yet failed to address the elephant in the room when it comes to actually securing the site itself. Almost all the time, when I perform a quick security audit using something simple like the below

    https://securityheaders.io

    I often see something like this

    Not a pretty sight. Not only does this expose your site to unprecedented risk, but also looks bad when others decide to perform a simple (and very public) check. Worse still is the sheer number of so called “security experts” who claim to solve all of your security issues with their “silver bullet” solution (sarcasm intended), yet have neglected to get their own house in order. So that can you do to resolve this issue ? It’s actually much easier than it seems. Dependant on the web server you are running, you can include these headers.

    Apache

    <IfModule mod_headers.c>
Header set X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN"
header set X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block"
Header set X-Download-Options "noopen"
Header set X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff"
Header set Content-Security-Policy "upgrade-insecure-requests"
Header set Referrer-Policy 'no-referrer' add
Header set Feature-Policy "geolocation 'self' https://yourdomain.com"
Header set Permissions-Policy "geolocation=(),midi=(),sync-xhr=(),microphone=(),camera=(),magnetometer=(),gyroscope=(),fullscreen=(self),payment=()"
Header set X-Powered-By "Whatever text you want to appear here"
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "https://yourdomain.com"
Header set X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies "none"
Header set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload"
</IfModule>

    NGINX

    add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;
add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block";
add_header X-Download-Options "noopen" always;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;
add_header Content-Security-Policy "upgrade-insecure-requests" always;
add_header Referrer-Policy 'no-referrer' always;
add_header Feature-Policy "geolocation 'self' https://yourdomain.com" always;
add_header Permissions-Policy "geolocation=(),midi=(),sync-xhr=(),microphone=(),camera=(),magnetometer=(),gyroscope=(),fullscreen=(self),payment=();";
add_header X-Powered-By "Whatever text you want to appear here" always;
add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin "https://yourdomain.com" always;
add_header X-Permitted-Cross-Domain-Policies "none" always;
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains;" always;

    Note, that https://yourdomain.com should be changed to reflect your actual domain. This is just a placeholder to demonstrate how the headers need to be structured.

    Restart Apache or NGINX, and then perform the test again.


    That’s better !

    More detail around these headers can be found here

    https://webdock.io/en/docs/how-guides/security-guides/how-to-configure-security-headers-in-nginx-and-apache

    Mark
    Founder - Phenomlab Ltd

    Executive Technology & Security Leadership

    1
Log in to reply

Related Topics
  • JACundefined

    Most privacy / security focused password manager

    Unsolved Privacy security pass manager password
    12
    7 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    JACundefined
    @DownPW this looks interesting! .
  • DownPWundefined

    Setting for high load and prevent DDoS (sysctl, iptables, crowdsec or other)

    Security security server kernel ddos iptables
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @DownPW most of this really depends on your desired security model. In all cases with firewalls, less is always more, although it’s never as clear cut as that, and there are always bespoke ports you’ll need to open periodically. Heztner’s DDoS protection is superior, and I know they have invested a lot of time, effort, and money into making it extremely effective. However, if you consider that the largest ever DDoS attack hit Cloudflare at 71m rps (and they were able to deflect it), and each attack can last anywhere between 8-24 hours which really depends on how determined the attacker(s) is/are, you can never be fully prepared - nor can you trace it’s true origin. DDoS attacks by their nature (Distributed Denial of Service) are conducted by large numbers of devices whom have become part of a “bot army” - and in most cases, the owners of these devices are blissfully unaware that they have been attacked and are under command and control from a nefarious resource. Given that the attacks originate from multiple sources, this allows the real attacker to observe from a distance whilst concealing their own identity and origin in the process. If you consider the desired effect of DDoS, it is not an attempt to access ports that are typically closed, but to flood (and eventually overwhelm) the target (such as a website) with millions of requests per second in an attempt to force it offline. Victims of DDoS attacks are often financial services for example, with either extortion or financial gain being the primary objective - in other words, pay for the originator to stop the attack. It’s even possible to get DDoS as a service these days - with a credit card, a few clicks of a mouse and a target IP, you can have your own proxy campaign running in minutes which typically involves “booters” or “stressers” - see below for more https://heimdalsecurity.com/blog/ddos-as-a-service-attacks-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work @DownPW said in Setting for high load and prevent DDoS (sysctl, iptables, crowdsec or other): in short if you have any advice to give to secure the best. It’s not just about DDos or firewalls. There are a number of vulnerabilities on all systems that if not patched, will expose that same system to exploit. One of my favourite online testers which does a lot more than most basic ones is below https://www.immuniweb.com/websec/ I’d start with the findings reported here and use that to branch outwards.
  • phenomlabundefined

    ION brings clients back online after ransomware attack

    Blog ransomware backups compromise
    12
    1
    9 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined
    @crazycells said in ION brings clients back online after ransomware attack: you know, they believe the world revolves around them Haha, yes. And they invented s*x.
  • phenomlabundefined

    Secure SSH connectivty

    Security ssh keys security
    7
    6 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    DownPWundefined
    @phenomlab yep but I use it since several month and I haven’t see any bugs or crash In any case, I only use him anymore Tabby offers tabs and a panel system, but also themes, plugins and color palettes to allow you to push the experience to the limit. It can support different shells in the same window, offers completion, has an encrypted container for your passwords, SSH keys and other secrets, and can handle different connection profiles. Each tab is persistent (you can restore them if you close one by mistake) and has a notification system, which will let you know if, for example, a process is finished while you are tapping in another tab. It’s really a great terminal that will easily replace cmd.exe for Windowsians or your usual terminal. And it can even work in a portable version for those who like to carry their tools on a USB key. –> To test it, you can download it, but there is also a web version. Handy for getting an idea. https://app.tabby.sh
  • phenomlabundefined

    Hardening WordPress - Reducing the attack vector

    Blog wordpress hardening
    13
    1
    1 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    JACundefined
    @phenomlab said in Hardening WordPress - Reducing the attack vector: @jac Microsoft’s and Google’s Authenticator both support TOTP - essentially, a time based system that changes every 30 seconds. The main principle here is that the device itself carrying the One Time Passcode only needs to be in sync with the source server in terms of time, and can be completely offline with no internet access. Provided the time matches on both devices, the One Time Passcode will be accepted. Applications such as Microsoft Authenticator and Authy also support push notification meaning you just choose either yes or no on your device when prompted, and then that response is sent back to the origin which then determines if access is granted or not. One of the best looking password less authentication models was CLEF - sadly, this product died out due to a lack of funding (if I recall correctly) although some open source implementations of this have appeared quite recently. Essentially, both products will achieve the same goal. TOTP is an industry standard, and widely accepted across the board. Not all services offer push confirmation. Many thanks for the detailed reply mate. There’s some great advice in there that will help me secure my accounts.
  • phenomlabundefined

    Never underestimate the importance of security

    Blog security complacency
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    534 Views
    No one has replied
  • phenomlabundefined

    Hackers aren't evil - separating fact and FUD

    Blog hackers security
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    573 Views
    No one has replied
  • phenomlabundefined

    Changing Passwords Regularly Actually Weakens Security

    Blog security blog
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied