Skip to content

what is the reason for choosing node BB over flarum?

Solved Performance
  • @jac @Hari my thoughts around this are that with any platform - be that WordPress, Flarum, or NodeBB, there is an inevitable “lock in” - very much like Hotel California (“you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave”).

    What I mean by this is that you are buying into an ecosystem that offers no easy or readily available path out. If you plan to stay for the long term and there is a clear progression path from that project meaning it’s a viable route, then great.

    However, all of these platforms (except WordPress perhaps) have a way of ingesting data from other sources, but little to no way at all of taking that data somewhere else. This is nothing against any of those platforms, but the fundamental issue here is that whilst it’s probably easy to move into another product, it’s a different story altogether when you want to leave and take your data with you.

    Most FOSS based platforms can realise this and make money out of migrations. I know for certain that wpForo does this, and I also know that it’s something that one of the developers at Flarum has been touting for some time.

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab referenced this topic on
  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab referenced this topic on
  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab referenced this topic on

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    743 Views
    No one has replied
  • NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    236 Views

    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above

  • Coding question: fetch vs $.ajax call from Shopify

    Solved Performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    258 Views

    @Panda You should be able to use {% javscript %} as shown in this video - it’s quite the watch, but very educational, and provides insight as to how this works - see below screenshot for an example

    cdb160e9-d955-498c-b921-982db2986e2b-image.png

  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    323 Views

    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

    However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365

    And also

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164

    It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”.

    Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.

  • build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    218 Views

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • NodeBB v3.0.0-rc.1

    Performance
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    127 Views
    No one has replied
  • NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance
    69
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    6k Views

    @phenomlab

    Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made

    # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000

    If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice

    https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/