Skip to content

Threaded post support for NodeBB

Let's Build It

Related Topics
  • 5 Votes
    3 Posts
    594 Views

    Very good like always 😉

  • Material View Support for Stock NodeBB

    Unsolved Let's Build It
    51
    15 Votes
    51 Posts
    3k Views

    Oh yes, that’s what’s super cool, I learn something every day. Afterwards I start from so low in JS

  • Threaded chat support for NodeBB

    Let's Build It
    35
    19 Votes
    35 Posts
    2k Views

    @DownPW said in Threaded chat support for NodeBB:

    Better like this : add shadow and border-left on self answer

    Of course - you style to your own requirements and taste 🙂 I’ll commit that CSS we discussed yesterday also

  • NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    203 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • Removing blue 'moved' tag from post

    Solved Configure
    16
    3 Votes
    16 Posts
    516 Views

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • NodeBB: Consent page

    Solved Configure
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    641 Views

    @DownPW I still do not see any issues.

  • creating topic specific widgets

    Solved Customisation
    16
    10 Votes
    16 Posts
    842 Views

    @crazycells said in creating topic specific widgets:

    Additionally if hide class exists, why are we re-defining it?

    We’re not 🤭 I misspelled it - it should be hidden