Skip to content
Sudonix

NodeBB 1.19.3

Solved Performance

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • DownPWundefined

    NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    289 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • mventuresundefined

    NodeBB: Consent page

    Solved Configure
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    859 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW I still do not see any issues.

  • mventuresundefined

    NodeBB: Privileges for the Announcement channel

    Solved Configure
    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    290 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    Up to you really 🙂

  • phenomlabundefined

    Optimum config for NodeBB under NGINX

    Performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    816 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @crazycells hi - no security reason, or anything specific in this case. However, the nginx.conf I posted was from my Dev environment which uses this port as a way of not interfering with production.

    And yes, I use clustering on this site with three instances.

  • DownPWundefined

    [NodeBB] Auto assign a label or group title

    Solved Customisation
    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    645 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW very useful tip. Thanks

  • phenomlabundefined

    NodeBB slow after DB recovery

    Solved Performance
    1
    5 Votes
    1 Posts
    287 Views
    No one has replied
  • JACundefined

    NodeBB Footer

    Solved Customisation
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    JACundefined

    @phenomlab said in NodeBB Footer:

    @jac and you. Hope all is well and you recover quickly

    Thanks pal 😁🤝🏻