Skip to content

Threaded post support for NodeBB

Let's Build It
146 5 85.0k 1
  • Hello @phenomlab

    I see this, when someone composes, it is displayed via the plugin like this (To the left of the Thread View button.). I do not know if it’s normal or if it is better to put it on the right like the others ?

    image.png

    or myself for example :

    33a99e14-13e5-4e67-beaa-25d02b39bb59-image.png

    @DownPW Mmmm - I thought that this would happen. In your js function, can you locate this line

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    Replace it with

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled').append(threadView);
    

    51179c3a-e0cf-4f1f-a36b-79beb1655e88-image.png

    The issue here is that the hidden-xs class is being manipulated by js which forces the position and does not use relative. This new code should hopefully work around that. It will change the placement of the threaded toggle, but for the better I think. If this works, I’ll commit the code to git

  • @phenomlab

    I don’t use this line, I commented out this line as stipulated in the script

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    But use this line :

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    image.png

    maybe change for this ?

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    
  • @phenomlab

    I don’t use this line, I commented out this line as stipulated in the script

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul .hidden-xs').append(threadView);
    

    But use this line :

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    image.png

    maybe change for this ?

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled [component="topic/browsing-users"]:last-of-type').append(threadView);
    

    @DownPW sorry, use this one.

    $('.topic .sticky-tools ul.list-unstyled').append(threadView);
    

    Replace any existing line

  • image.png

    With this code the entire plugin is now displayed to the left of the Thread View button. I even think I prefer the way it was before.
    I find it more logical that all users are displayed to the right of the button and not to the left.

  • image.png

    With this code the entire plugin is now displayed to the left of the Thread View button. I even think I prefer the way it was before.
    I find it more logical that all users are displayed to the right of the button and not to the left.

    @DownPW up to you of course but the browsing users plugin makes several adjustments to element positioning, and without moving the threading toggle outside of that, you’ll always have the issue where the composing user appears on the left because under the old code, the threading toggle shares the same space which causes the alignment issue.

    Moving outside of that div is the only way to resolve the issue. There is another way which is to append the topic tools element but that then means that users without adequate permissions will not be able to use the threading toggle at all.

  • hello @phenomlab

    I see this bug with thread view mode :

    image.png

    maybe play with z-index for resolve ?

  • hello @phenomlab

    I see this bug with thread view mode :

    image.png

    maybe play with z-index for resolve ?

    @DownPW yes, that’s definitely a z-index issue.

  • After test, seems to be good with add this in JS function in if and else :

    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').addClass('threaded'); //test
    
    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').removeClass('threaded'); //test
    

    and this to CSS :

    [component="topic/quickreply/container"].threaded {
        z-index: -1 !important;
        position: relative;
    }
    

    Tell me if this seems correct to you @phenomlab

  • After test, seems to be good with add this in JS function in if and else :

    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').addClass('threaded'); //test
    
    $('[component="topic/quickreply/container"]').removeClass('threaded'); //test
    

    and this to CSS :

    [component="topic/quickreply/container"].threaded {
        z-index: -1 !important;
        position: relative;
    }
    

    Tell me if this seems correct to you @phenomlab

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

  • I haven’t tested everything. this is something to watch out for

  • I have the same problem for thread but this time I can’t solve it 😞

    image.png

    image.png

  • I have the same problem for thread but this time I can’t solve it 😞

    image.png

    image.png

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

  • @DownPW Let me have a look.

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

  • @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW Let me have a look.

    Thanks Mark 🙂

    @phenomlab said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    @DownPW seems fine, yes. Any obvious conflict with other elements?

    Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    It’s a bit the same problem as the previous bug.

    It would be more interesting to act on the dropdown menu than the other elements one by one but my attempts are not fruitful for the moment.

    We could kill one stone/two birds

    @DownPW I see the issue. Can you please make the below CSS changes - notice the ones commented out and their replacements (which you should follow)

    .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline .timeline-event, .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component="post/placeholder"], .page-topic .topic .posts.timeline > [component=post] {
        border-left: none;
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
        background: var(--bs-body-bg);
        border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    
    li[component=post].threaded {
        /* transform: translateX(-100px); */
        /* transition: transform 0.3s ease !important; */
        margin-left: -75px !important;
        transition: margin-left 0.3s ease, margin-right 0.3s ease !important;
    }
    

    My expectation is that this will still work (but using margin instead of transform), and also ensure that the reverse dropdown is not being hidden by the [component="post"] elements.

    When you use transform on an element, a new stacking order is created for it. As you are transforming a parent which doesn’t have z-index of it’s own, a new stacking order for itself and child elements is created. As a result, the child element with z-index remains below the [component="post"] elements.

    If you want to see this in action before applying the CSS, you can remove translateX(-100px) from the li[component=post].threaded class and then try the dropdown menu again. You’ll notice it appears correctly this time, although the content is not being shifted because the translate has been removed.

    We replace it with margin which is slightly less performant when it comes to animation, but the nature of NodeBB is to lazyload posts, therefore, this negates the overall impact to the DOM.

    Let me know if this works.

  • Thats work. Many thanks for resolve
    Thanks for the information, I understand better.

    Would have a working solution other than mine for this :

  • Thats work. Many thanks for resolve
    Thanks for the information, I understand better.

    Would have a working solution other than mine for this :

    @DownPW is that still an issue? I can’t replicate that on your dev site?

    aef70b6b-f702-4a8e-9bab-c0bfd8a34628-image.png

  • Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix 🙂

    image.png

  • Besides, my solution above is only partial. It turns out that sometimes I can no longer click to reply to the post via quick Reply. Nothing happens when I click to enter text

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix 🙂

    image.png

    @DownPW said in Threading support for NodeBB:

    cache maybe. I have delete the bugfix because not bug fix

    Yes, I can’t reproduce this.

  • I mean bug is present but my bug fix don’t work properly.

    test to delete my cache and tell you

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab referenced this topic on
  • @phenomlab not cache 😞


Related Topics
  • Custom Page - nodebb

    Solved Customisation custom-pages nodebb
    13
    2
    5 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    I’m happy to see this
  • 3 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    Very great
  • NodeBB Twitter / X embeds

    Let's Build It twitter script
    34
    21 Votes
    34 Posts
    12k Views
    @phenomlab said: @DownPW thanks for spotting (and fixing) this issue. I admittedly threw this together quickly for @jac some time ago, and it hasn’t had any love since. If OK with you, I’ll merge these changes into the github repository? No problem dude
  • 5 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    Very good like always
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • 21 Votes
    110 Posts
    41k Views
    @crazycells said in Setup OGProxy for use in NodeBB: are they cached for each user separately? No. It’s a shared cache @crazycells said in Setup OGProxy for use in NodeBB: additionally, this is also handling youtube videos etc, right? No. This is handled by nodebb-plugin-ns-embed
  • NodeBB v3 Android Problem

    Solved Configure nodebb android
    4
    4 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    thank you fixed.
  • background color of the footer area

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    7
    1
    7 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    @phenomlab thank you very much