Skip to content

NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

Unsolved Performance
  • @veronikya only accessible via VPN is very secure, and easily the best way to completely isolate the site from the rest of the Internet.

    The downside of this is that your site isn’t publicly accessible without the VPN connection which would mean it falls under the umbrella of deep web. However, depending on the content, it may be what is required in order to keep sensitive information or topics secured.

  • Hello

    just for test, I wanted to test that configuration in my dev instance :

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/7930/using-cloudflare-with-nodebb

    But I have this error uninterruptedly :

    b5eb4be0-873f-45c7-8c70-08f83bf35e34-image.png
    And I don’t know why

    Nodebb config for socket.io :

    aa9716b3-506c-4551-a582-50d4cf91cf89-image.png

    Nginx config for socket.XXXX.XXXX

    server {
    	server_name socket.XXXXX.fr www.socket.XXXX.fr mail.socket.XXXX.fr;
    	root /home/XXXXX/domains/socket.XXXX.fr/public_html;
    	index index.php index.htm index.html;
    	access_log /var/log/virtualmin/socket.XXXX.fr_access_log;
    	error_log /var/log/virtualmin/socket.XXXX.fr_error_log;
    	fastcgi_param GATEWAY_INTERFACE CGI/1.1;
    	fastcgi_param SERVER_SOFTWARE nginx;
    	fastcgi_param QUERY_STRING $query_string;
    	fastcgi_param REQUEST_METHOD $request_method;
    	fastcgi_param CONTENT_TYPE $content_type;
    	fastcgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length;
    	fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME "/home/XXXXX/domains/socket.XXXXXX.fr/public_html$fastcgi_script_name";
    	fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME $fastcgi_script_name;
    	fastcgi_param REQUEST_URI $request_uri;
    	fastcgi_param DOCUMENT_URI $document_uri;
    	fastcgi_param DOCUMENT_ROOT /home/XXXXX/domains/socket.XXXXX.fr/public_html;
    	fastcgi_param SERVER_PROTOCOL $server_protocol;
    	fastcgi_param REMOTE_ADDR $remote_addr;
    	fastcgi_param REMOTE_PORT $remote_port;
    	fastcgi_param SERVER_ADDR $server_addr;
    	fastcgi_param SERVER_PORT $server_port;
    	fastcgi_param SERVER_NAME $server_name;
    	fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
    	fastcgi_param HTTPS $https;
    	location ^~ /.well-known/ {
    		try_files $uri /;
    	}
    	location ~ "\.php(/|$)" {
    		try_files $uri $fastcgi_script_name =404;
    		default_type application/x-httpd-php;
    		fastcgi_pass unix:/var/php-fpm/16908800991403014.sock;
    	}
    
    	location / {
            proxy_set_header X-Real-IP       $remote_addr;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
            proxy_set_header Host            $http_host;
            proxy_set_header X-NginX-Proxy   true;
            proxy_set_header Upgrade         $http_upgrade;
            proxy_set_header Connection      "upgrade";
            proxy_redirect                   off;
            proxy_http_version               1.1;
            proxy_pass                       http://localhost:4567;
        }
    
    	fastcgi_split_path_info "^(.+\.php)(/.+)$";
    	location /cgi-bin/ {
    		gzip off;
    		root /home/XXXXX/domains/socket.XXXXX.fr/cgi-bin;
    		fastcgi_pass unix:/var/fcgiwrap/16908800991403014.sock/socket;
    		fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME "/home/XXXXXXX/domains/socket.XXXXXX.fr$fastcgi_script_name";
    		fastcgi_param GATEWAY_INTERFACE CGI/1.1;
    		fastcgi_param SERVER_SOFTWARE nginx;
    		fastcgi_param QUERY_STRING $query_string;
    		fastcgi_param REQUEST_METHOD $request_method;
    		fastcgi_param CONTENT_TYPE $content_type;
    		fastcgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length;
    		fastcgi_param SCRIPT_NAME $fastcgi_script_name;
    		fastcgi_param REQUEST_URI $request_uri;
    		fastcgi_param DOCUMENT_URI $document_uri;
    		fastcgi_param DOCUMENT_ROOT /home/XXXXXXX/domains/socket.XXXXXXX.fr/public_html;
    		fastcgi_param SERVER_PROTOCOL $server_protocol;
    		fastcgi_param REMOTE_ADDR $remote_addr;
    		fastcgi_param REMOTE_PORT $remote_port;
    		fastcgi_param SERVER_ADDR $server_addr;
    		fastcgi_param SERVER_PORT $server_port;
    		fastcgi_param SERVER_NAME $server_name;
    		fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
    		fastcgi_param HTTPS $https;
    	}
    	listen x.x.x.x:443 ssl;
    	listen [x.x.x.x::1]:443 ssl;
        ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/media.XXXXXX.fr/fullchain.pem; # managed by Certbot
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/media.XXXXXXXX.fr/privkey.pem;
     # managed by Certbot
    }
    server {
        if ($host = socket.virtuaverse.fr) {
            return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
        } # managed by Certbot
    
    
    	server_name socket.XXXXXXXX.fr www.socket.XXXXXX.fr mail.socket.XXXXXXx.fr;
    	listen x.x.x.x;
    	listen [x.x.x.x::1];
        return 404; # managed by Certbot
    
    
    }
    

    Cloudflare config :

    6dd0bf70-d22d-4fb5-a5c3-e5a275722dcc-image.png

  • @DownPW Does this issue manifest itself in Incognito mode?

  • yes, it does

  • @DownPW You should simplify the nginx config - below a suggestion

    server {
    	server_name socket.XXXXX.fr www.socket.XXXX.fr mail.socket.XXXX.fr;
    	access_log /var/log/virtualmin/socket.XXXX.fr_access_log;
    	error_log /var/log/virtualmin/socket.XXXX.fr_error_log;
    	listen x.x.x.x:443 ssl;
    	listen [x.x.x.x::1]:443 ssl;
        ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/media.XXXXXX.fr/fullchain.pem; # managed by Certbot
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/media.XXXXXXXX.fr/privkey.pem;
    
    	location / {
            proxy_set_header X-Real-IP       $remote_addr;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
            proxy_set_header Host            $http_host;
            proxy_set_header X-NginX-Proxy   true;
            proxy_set_header Upgrade         $http_upgrade;
            proxy_set_header Connection      "upgrade";
            proxy_redirect                   off;
            proxy_http_version               1.1;
            proxy_pass                       http://localhost:4567;
        }
    
    
     # managed by Certbot
    }
    server {
        if ($host = socket.virtuaverse.fr) {
            return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
        } # managed by Certbot
    	server_name socket.XXXXXXXX.fr www.socket.XXXXXX.fr mail.socket.XXXXXXx.fr;
    	listen x.x.x.x;
    	listen [x.x.x.x::1];
        return 404; # managed by Certbot
    }
    
  • @DownPW Also remove these lines and restart nginx

    root /home/XXXXX/domains/socket.XXXX.fr/public_html;
    
    	index index.php index.htm index.html;
    
  • Same

    image.png

  • I see this on start log nodebb

    e5fc0e62-fa92-461d-9bfe-2b2b9ace2232-image.png

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab forked this topic on
  • There’s more of an issue here - try to change any CSS or JS in the ACP, and you’ll see that it does not save.

  • ???

  • @DownPW Now working for me in Incognito. Can you check

  • @phenomlab said in NodeBB socket with CloudFlare:

    There’s more of an issue here - try to change any CSS or JS in the ACP, and you’ll see that it does not save.

    due to socket.io configuration in nodebb config.json file

    Actually I have delete socket.io block and change CSS and save is good.

  • @DownPW Ok, but that now means you should not need the socket A record anymore because it’s not used. From the logs, the socket is running on the site’s URL.

  • normal that it is not used (A record) @phenomlab because there currently, I do not use it because the socket.io block is removed from config.json.

    I’m just in normal mode with Cloudflare :

    5272437e-9b74-4482-881a-5c376cf73900-image.png

    I can put it back if you want ?

  • @DownPW It seems to be working fine without it, so I’d leave it. I see zero socket errors, so all good.

  • because I’m alone on the server.

    The goal is to try to market this method before putting it into production where i have a lot of errors

    And we can see that it doesn’t work when I try to reroute the web sockets in non-proxied mode. (socket error, no save when chnage in ACP, etc…)

    I don’t know if I can make myself understood. @phenomlab 🙂

  • @DownPW Understood. Even with just the two of us connected, I was still getting the websocket error, but I think that was related to config etc. In all honesty, this is yet another reason why I stopped using CF. I know you need it to hide your IP address, but if you bypass CF for the socket, you are exposing your IP anyway.

  • I know, I know,

    too bad… I just wanted to test this method but it seems more complex than it looks to make it work correctly

    The reverse proxy method is currently too expensive for me and technically too abstract

  • @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.


Related Topics
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    292 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • What is this bar called?

    Solved Customisation
    92
    36 Votes
    92 Posts
    8k Views

    This is good 👍

  • NodeBB upgrade now cant post

    Solved Bugs
    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    403 Views

    @Panda yes, for some reason, that is the case. If you need an urgent response, it’s probably better to post here because of the time difference.

  • build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    224 Views

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • NodeBB v3.0.0-rc.1

    Performance
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    130 Views
    No one has replied
  • Upgrade Problem from 2.8.3 to 2.8.4

    Solved Configure
    35
    8 Votes
    35 Posts
    2k Views

    @cagatay No, you can ignore that.

  • Bootstrap Version

    Solved Customisation
    8
    5 Votes
    8 Posts
    539 Views

    @phenomlab That will be nice once they have completed that. It will be interesting to see how long that takes. So for now I will use custom css to make it look the way I want. Frameworks just make things a little faster. Thanks @phenomlab

  • 5 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views

    is there any way to see whose reputation is changed by this plugin?