Skip to content

Interesting Widget code, but can't fetch API

Solved Customisation

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • CSS code customization for the link preview plugin

    Solved Customisation
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    598 Views

    @crazycells said in CSS code customization for the link preview plugin:

    does OGProxy show the pdf previews as well?

    Not yet, but it could with a bit of additional code.

  • CSS codes to prevent votes to disappear

    Solved Customisation
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    272 Views

    @phenomlab yes, it is 🙂 thanks a lot…

  • Following the API docs but its not clear ...

    Solved Customisation
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    500 Views

    @Panda you’d be surprised. If you consider that you’d need to use the API to be able to populate a WordPress widget for example (which in turn would of course be PHP), taking this route is still immensely popular.

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    282 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • build nodebb Warning in entrypoint size limit

    Solved Performance
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    212 Views

    @eeeee they are nothing to worry about, and can be ignored.

  • 11 Votes
    14 Posts
    832 Views

    @dave1904 excellent news. Thanks for the feedback

  • NodeBB Discord Plugins

    Unsolved Customisation
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    971 Views

    @RiekMedia hi. Just following up on this thread (I know it’s old) but was curious to understand if it’s still an issue or not ?

  • Display tweets in widget [NodeBB]

    Solved Customisation
    29
    4 Votes
    29 Posts
    3k Views

    @phenomlab brilliant, many thanks Mark 😁