Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 20.6k 2
  • @cagatay Something like this?

    7a330ecb-474e-4cb8-9b04-042f4fa9acc1-image.png

    Add this to your custom CSS (obviously change colours to suit taste)

    @media (min-width: 1200px) {
    li.topic-owner-post .content, li.topic-response-post .content {
        background: lightgrey;
        padding: 30px;
        border-radius: 6px;
    }
    .topic .posts.timeline .timeline-event>div:not(.content), .topic .posts.timeline>[component=post]>div:not(.content) {
        margin-left: 2.5rem;
    }
    [data-index="0"] .content[component="post/content"]:before, .topic-owner-post:before, .topic-response-post:before {
        border-left: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid lightgrey;
        top: 66px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        left: 70px;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"])[itemprop="text"] {
        background: lightblue;
        padding: 30px;
        border-radius: 6px;
        margin-right: 8.5rem !important;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"]):after, li.self-post.topic-owner-post:first-child:after {
    border-right: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid var(--self-post);
        top: 66px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        right: 90px;
        left: unset !important;
        border-bottom: none !important;
        bottom: unset !important;
    }
    li.self-post.topic-response-post .pull-left {
        float: right !important;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"]):after, li.self-post.topic-owner-post:first-child:after {
        border-right: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid lightblue;
        top: 58px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        right: 95px;
        left: unset !important;
        border-bottom: none !important;
        bottom: unset !important;
    }
    }
    

    Add this to your custom JS

    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    
    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab there is one small problem that shown below;

    26fa885d-91b1-441e-a170-a1e4ae76e46e-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is one small problem that shown below;

    26fa885d-91b1-441e-a170-a1e4ae76e46e-image.png

    @cagatay There’s a missing float by the looks of it. Can you PM me a login and password for the site so I can check?

  • @phenomlab there is one small problem that shown below;

    26fa885d-91b1-441e-a170-a1e4ae76e46e-image.png

    @cagatay I can’t see any issue here?

    480259db-f513-4e75-8390-37d2958fdd94-image.png

    Can you PM me the link to that post?

  • @cagatay I can’t see any issue here?

    480259db-f513-4e75-8390-37d2958fdd94-image.png

    Can you PM me the link to that post?

    @phenomlab yes from now everything is great, thank you dear.

  • @phenomlab yes from now everything is great, thank you dear.

    @cagatay Great. Thanks. I’ll mark this as resolved.

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Great. Thanks. I’ll mark this as resolved.

    @phenomlab there is one unknown symbol at the post, i cant delete it. This is when i answered seems.

    57d5f412-fd83-4a42-a751-d32cd689c1a3-image.png

    ca9f5b27-3034-4e2d-bc41-f1e30e496559-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is one unknown symbol at the post, i cant delete it. This is when i answered seems.

    57d5f412-fd83-4a42-a751-d32cd689c1a3-image.png

    ca9f5b27-3034-4e2d-bc41-f1e30e496559-image.png

    @cagatay let me have a look

    EDIT - yes, I see why. Because we are using a pseudo class, this is being applied to multiple elements, so we are forced to change the colour of the class where you see the erroneous addition to use a darker one so that you do not see it.

    This is what I had to do on my own install as a workaround. It’s crude, but it’ll work.

  • @cagatay let me have a look

    EDIT - yes, I see why. Because we are using a pseudo class, this is being applied to multiple elements, so we are forced to change the colour of the class where you see the erroneous addition to use a darker one so that you do not see it.

    This is what I had to do on my own install as a workaround. It’s crude, but it’ll work.

    @phenomlab ok dear, waiting for it. thanks.

  • @phenomlab ok dear, waiting for it. thanks.

    @cagatay You need to change the colours yourself, so the .self-post is darker than the .topic-owner-post

  • @cagatay You need to change the colours yourself, so the .self-post is darker than the .topic-owner-post

    @phenomlab nothing changed dear.

  • @phenomlab nothing changed dear.

    @cagatay You also need to set the same for .topic-response-post

  • @cagatay You also need to set the same for .topic-response-post

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    .topic-response-post

    So i think we can fixed that small problem to use same color all of them 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    .topic-response-post

    So i think we can fixed that small problem to use same color all of them 🙂

    @cagatay You can try this (with different colours), but it might be a bit greedy

    li.self-post.topic-response-post:before {
        display: none;
    }
    
  • @cagatay You can try this (with different colours), but it might be a bit greedy

    li.self-post.topic-response-post:before {
        display: none;
    }
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:
    Same color is worked.

    li.self-post.topic-response-post:before {
    display: none;
    }

    also worked 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:
    Same color is worked.

    li.self-post.topic-response-post:before {
    display: none;
    }

    also worked 🙂

    @cagatay Good. Keep an eye on that though - as I said, it may produce unexpected results as it’s quite “greedy”

  • @cagatay Good. Keep an eye on that though - as I said, it may produce unexpected results as it’s quite “greedy”

    @phenomlab If the post is new one created by me, there is also shown 🙂

    856c68b0-b288-46d5-aa7f-75a8c2658e47-image.png

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    Good. Keep an eye on that though - as I said, it may produce unexpected results as it’s quite “greedy”

    Yes i know dear, it is a no problem for me, i m learning with you thats cool.

  • @phenomlab If the post is new one created by me, there is also shown 🙂

    856c68b0-b288-46d5-aa7f-75a8c2658e47-image.png

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    Good. Keep an eye on that though - as I said, it may produce unexpected results as it’s quite “greedy”

    Yes i know dear, it is a no problem for me, i m learning with you thats cool.

    @cagatay This is a bit experimental currently, but the below jQuery should detect correctly when the HTML being targeted has no class.

    Can you please try replacing the below you previously inserted

    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    
    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    

    with

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    Try it and let me know.

  • @cagatay This is a bit experimental currently, but the below jQuery should detect correctly when the HTML being targeted has no class.

    Can you please try replacing the below you previously inserted

    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    
    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    

    with

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    Try it and let me know.

    @phenomlab nothing changed for first owner post;

    0e13b6dc-ac14-4a15-b56b-e5b87461d351-image.png

  • @phenomlab nothing changed for first owner post;

    0e13b6dc-ac14-4a15-b56b-e5b87461d351-image.png

    @cagatay Is that with or without the new functions I provided, or with both ?

  • @cagatay Is that with or without the new functions I provided, or with both ?

    @phenomlab css side;

    @media (min-width: 1200px) {
    li.topic-owner-post .content, li.topic-response-post .content {
        background: PowderBlue;
        padding: 30px;
        border-radius: 6px;
    }
    .topic .posts.timeline .timeline-event>div:not(.content), .topic .posts.timeline>[component=post]>div:not(.content) {
        margin-left: 2.5rem;
    }
    [data-index="0"] .content[component="post/content"]:before, .topic-owner-post:before, .topic-response-post:before {
        border-left: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid PowderBlue;
        top: 66px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        left: 70px;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"])[itemprop="text"] {
        background: CadetBlue;
        padding: 30px;
        border-radius: 6px;
        margin-right: 8.5rem !important;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"]):after, li.self-post.topic-owner-post:first-child:after {
        border-right: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid var(--self-post);
        top: 66px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        right: 90px;
        left: unset !important;
        border-bottom: none !important;
        bottom: unset !important;
    }
    li.self-post.topic-response-post .pull-left {
        float: right !important;
    }
    li.self-post .content:not(.isSolved [component="post/content"]):after, li.self-post.topic-owner-post:first-child:after {
        border-right: 20px solid transparent;
        border-top: 20px solid CadetBlue;
        top: 58px;
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        right: 95px;
        left: unset !important;
        border-bottom: none !important;
        bottom: unset !important;
    }
    }
    li.self-post.topic-response-post:before {
        display: none;
    }
    
    

    JS side;

    $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
        $(document).ready(function() {
            if (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.topic-owner-post') || (!$('li[component="post"]').hasClass('.self-post'))) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
    
            }
        });
    });
    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 3 Votes
    1 Posts
    653 Views
    No one has replied
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    949 Views
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    653 Views
    No one has replied
  • Why CSS acts different in Desktop?

    Bugs nodebb
    11
    4 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW I’d have to agree with that.
  • optional "snow falling" theme

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    6
    6 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    @Sala ok, but that’s still the same loop which is going to have an impact on the CPU.
  • CSS codes for fa-info icon

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    9
    1
    6 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    I have just figured it out… it can be targeted with text-decoration-color: I was mistakenly using color
  • [NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

    Solved Customisation nodebb css bugfix
    237
    49 Votes
    237 Posts
    98k Views
    @baris said: You should change your selectors so it doesn’t look at the entire document. You probably only want to apply fancybox to stuff inside the #content element which is what changes when the user navigates around the page. So use $('#content a').... for your selectors then the forum logo in the header won’t be selected. I modified the JS Fancybox code now and this code and it seem better // --------------------------------------------- // Fancybox Media Reader (Without Website Logo) // --------------------------------------------- if (top.location.pathname !== '/login') { $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) { console.log("Polling DOM for lazyLoaded images to apply Fancybox"); $(document).ready(function() { $('#content a').not('.forum-logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); }); }); }); } if (top.location.pathname !== '/login') { $(document).ready(function() { $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) { $('#content a').not('.logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); data.preventDefault() // Strip out the images contained inside blockquotes as this looks nasty :) $('#content blockquote img').remove(); }); Fancybox.bind( '#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]', { groupAll: true, } ); }); }); } // Chat fancybox - fires when chat module loaded and AJAX calls new chat $(document).ready(function() { $(window).on('action:chat.loaded', function(data) { // >>> Se limiter au contenu principal uniquement <<< $('#content img').not('.forum-logo').not(".avatar").not(".emoji").not(".bmac-noanimate").each(function() { var newHref = $(this).attr("src"); $(this).wrap("<a class='fancybox' href='" + newHref + "'/>"); $('#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]').addClass("noanimate"); data.preventDefault(); // Strip out the images contained inside blockquotes as this looks nasty :) $('#content blockquote img').remove(); }); Fancybox.bind( '#content a[href*=".jpg"], #content a[href*=".jpeg"], #content a[href*=".png"], #content a[href*=".gif"], #content a[href*=".webp"]', { groupAll: true, } ); }); }); For the logo, I must use overflow: visible !important; on [component="brand/logo"] /* --- Logo --- */ [component="brand/logo"] { max-height: 50px; width: auto; height: auto; max-width: 100%; display: block; object-fit: contain; object-position: left center; overflow: visible !important; } Better result !!
  • [NODEBB] CSS Style Sheets SelectBox

    Locked Solved Customisation css
    112
    24 Votes
    112 Posts
    39k Views
    @DownPW as discussed in PM Seems to have been solved with the new JS code that you added allowing the version CSS file change!! Cache problem therefore with the JS of the Switcher theme Based on this, I will close this thread and reference https://sudonix.com/topic/207/nodebb-help-for-my-custom-css/27