Skip to content

Error shows as visitor views post

Moved Configure

  • Category For User

    Solved Configure
    11
    12 Votes
    11 Posts
    263 Views

    3.5.1 has now been released. I’ve just deployed it, so safe to do so!

  • Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    132 Views

    Use this code

    git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x

    And you will have the latest version without specifying it

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/

  • 2 Votes
    9 Posts
    233 Views

    @Panda I see why - if you check the browser console, there’s an error logged there. This is from one of my VM’s

    image.png

    There is a decision tree that pulls the value of the editor theme from the saved browser settings on each load, but that fails if the theme has never been changed, and the user has the default (in your case, you are using light mode, so it serves “flatly” by default, but the editor itself is never set and returns null

    This below code changes that

    /* If savedTheme is undefined it will return null - based on this, we assume that the user has the default theme selected and never changed it, so we'll need to force that here */ if(!savedTheme) { var savedTheme = "flatly"; }

    If you reload your browser and test again, it should work properly.

  • Fixed background to nodebb forum

    Solved Configure
    25
    4 Votes
    25 Posts
    1k Views

    @Panda said in Fixed background to nodebb forum:

    Chatgpt told me the ::before method.

    Go figure 😛

  • 3 Votes
    16 Posts
    485 Views

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • 2 Votes
    19 Posts
    576 Views

    @phenomlab Work now 😉

  • 0 Votes
    12 Posts
    500 Views

    @jac Not necessarily, no. The domain redirect is purely so that older links that point to the previous domain don’t just spit out a 404 error message when someone tries to access them.

    However, if the domain is seldom used, then why would you need the redirect in the first place (a point which you mentioned below). I’m still struggling to understand why you’d need two sites with the same information if the other domain is rarely used

  • 49 Votes
    213 Posts
    16k Views

    @crazycells briefly, yes. I think what concerns be the most with home brew VPN convective like this is a lack of security updates, and potentially leaving yourself open.

    I’ve yet to actually try it, but I know there are a variety of ways to achieve the same goal.