Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 20.6k 2
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.

  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

    @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

  • @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

    @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    
  • @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    

    @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

  • @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

    @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

  • @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

    @cagatay

    Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you :

    topic [component="post/parent"] {
        margin-left: 10px;
    }
    

    aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png

    Maybe @phenomlab have a better way


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    972 Views
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • Can you adjust Admin settings on your NodeBB?

    Bugs nodebb
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    @Panda as, yes, now I understand and that makes 100% sense. It means those who get down voted can still have an opinion and use common services. And yes, you’re right. Rather than down vote, just ignore if you don’t agree.
  • Upgrade Problem from 2.8.3 to 2.8.4

    Solved Configure nodebb
    35
    1
    8 Votes
    35 Posts
    8k Views
    @cagatay No, you can ignore that.
  • Changing Background on NodeBB

    Solved Customisation background image nodebb
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    @cagatay You’d target the body tag and use the below line of CSS background: url(/assets/customcss/backgrounds/default/default.png) no-repeat center center fixed; Obviously, you need to change the path to suit where your image is being stored. More info around the background property can be found here https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_background.php
  • is "night mode" shifting the forum several pixels up?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    8
    4 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    @crazycells hmm. Good point. I actually use my own version of the dark mode plugin, so not entirely sure. However, I think the CSS is probably the same. I’m not at my PC currently but can check and advise later.
  • Adjusting the size of boxes in posts-list class

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    @phenomlab thanks a lot, this combination works best .posts-list .posts-list-item .content { overflow: auto; max-height: 600px; }
  • Iframely (Nodebb)

    Solved Configure
    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    9k Views
    @DownPW This is now resolved. The issue was an incorrect URL specified in the Nodebb plugin. I’ve corrected this, and now it works as intended.