Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 19.6k 2
  • @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

    @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

  • @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

    @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

  • @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

    @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Not sure, but will check out a theory I have first before we go down that route.

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.

  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

  • @phenomlab there is small problem after revised codes which you shared.
    problem is shown below; answered nick and labels nested.

    8cb60812-c40c-4834-bdb2-bd8ef6271340-image.png

    @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

  • @cagatay that’s just a margin missing. The code I provided won’t be causing that. If you look for the element in the developers console and add a margin-left value to it, that should resolve it.

    @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    
  • @phenomlab may i use this code?

    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"] {
        float: left;
    }
    // Add these to (or edit) the existing classes you have
    .user-level-topic {
        float: none;
    }
    .group-label {
        margin-top: -1px;
    }
    .topic-owner-post [itemprop="author"]:after {
        margin-top: 1px;
        height: 18px;
    }
    

    @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

  • @cagatay from the screenshot you provided, it looks like you’ve used them. They are fine to use, but you are missing a couple of styles.

    I’ll have a look at this tomorrow and give you the remainder of the code you need.

    @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

  • @phenomlab i cant fix it 😞

    0ec83f76-a140-46dc-9a9f-b4f6f3d98b9c-image.png

    @cagatay

    Just add margin-left on the element like @phenomlab said to you :

    topic [component="post/parent"] {
        margin-left: 10px;
    }
    

    aa08c62b-4223-4cba-8c0f-c73d50474c0d-image.png

    Maybe @phenomlab have a better way


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 3 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    @kadir-ay-0 marking as resolved based on https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17109/manual-build-a-night-mode-for-harmony/5 Please do not raise requests in two places - here and the NodeBB forums. All this does is create unnecessary load for both parties.
  • What plugins are being used here on Sudonix?

    Solved General nodebb plugins development
    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    @Roki-Antic Welcome! This site isn’t running Persona, but Harmony - a very heavily customised version at that. Do you have a URL where your site is currently located that is publicly accessible? Feel free to PM this info if you do not want to disclose here. Happy to help with any customisation needs.
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • Smart Widgets

    Solved Configure nodebb
    9
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda said in Smart Widgets: So why is that, or conversely why would the function to expose username ever be required, as it seems app.user is already an available global object? It is, yes, but not if you are using it outside of a widget. The function I wrote is also historical and comes from the 2.x train
  • Email validation NodeBB

    Bugs nodebb
    21
    3 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    @Panda said in Email validation NodeBB: Did you configure that as a custom change to the usual quote icon. How do you do that? I notice on NodeBB site its a solid blue quotes Yes, I changed it. NodeBB by default users the free font awesome library whereas I use the pro (paid) version SDK have access to a wider set of icons, and at different thicknesses etc. The change of colour is just simple CSS.
  • Adding fileWrite to nodebb code

    Solved Configure nodebb
    16
    1
    5 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    @eveh this might be a question for the NodeBB Devs themselves. In all honesty, I’m not entirely sure without having to research this myself.
  • [NodeBB] First post customization

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    5
    4 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    @phenomlab thanks
  • nodebb dropdown menu

    Solved Configure nodebb
    5
    1
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    @phenomlab said in nodebb dropdown menu: @kurulumu-net You set it like the below example taken from this site [image: 1637939951821-aae36790-3257-4bb2-ad5a-0d744309876a-image.png] Which presents this [image: 1637939983445-77f47260-2941-4afe-9614-8e17dcfc8c19-image.png] Very interesting… I actually thought this wasn’t possible, as I remember it being asked in the NodeBB forum. Is this something new that’s been implemented? I’ll 100% be doing that when I’m on the laptop over the weekend.