Skip to content

v3 & Harmony diary / thoughts / code snippets

Announcements
55 4 14.0k 1
  • Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    @phenomlab

    Oh It’s very good. I love it 😊

  • Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    @phenomlab waiting 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    Hello Mark,

    I just tested the functioning of the scroll bar and I saw this bug:

    https://i.imgur.com/VQw5zw5.mp4

    It should be moved to the left so as not to encroach on the collapse button of the custom footer navbar.

    Then, when we play with the collapse button of the custom footer navbar we should:

    • When the custom footer navbar is deactivated: it sticks to the bottom right while not encroaching on the right sidebar. All this taking into account the collapse of the right sidebar (not obvious, I don’t know if I’m clear 🙂 )

    • When the custom footer navbar is activated: it moves just to the left of the floatright block or can be above the floatright block?

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Keep the good work my friend 😉

  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    Hello Mark,

    I just tested the functioning of the scroll bar and I saw this bug:

    https://i.imgur.com/VQw5zw5.mp4

    It should be moved to the left so as not to encroach on the collapse button of the custom footer navbar.

    Then, when we play with the collapse button of the custom footer navbar we should:

    • When the custom footer navbar is deactivated: it sticks to the bottom right while not encroaching on the right sidebar. All this taking into account the collapse of the right sidebar (not obvious, I don’t know if I’m clear 🙂 )

    • When the custom footer navbar is activated: it moves just to the left of the floatright block or can be above the floatright block?

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Keep the good work my friend 😉

  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    Hello Mark,

    I just tested the functioning of the scroll bar and I saw this bug:

    https://i.imgur.com/VQw5zw5.mp4

    It should be moved to the left so as not to encroach on the collapse button of the custom footer navbar.

    Then, when we play with the collapse button of the custom footer navbar we should:

    • When the custom footer navbar is deactivated: it sticks to the bottom right while not encroaching on the right sidebar. All this taking into account the collapse of the right sidebar (not obvious, I don’t know if I’m clear 🙂 )

    • When the custom footer navbar is activated: it moves just to the left of the floatright block or can be above the floatright block?

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Keep the good work my friend 😉

    @DownPW fixed in Dev. Have a look. Many improvements and I think you’ll like it. Try it on both desktop and mobile.

  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    Today’s playground 🙂

    c67e0b6c-b534-4306-8e58-dbe77e30c6a0-image.png

    Here’s a video… still needs a bit more work, but… 🙂 Notice the newer scroll and progress bar I was talking about earlier…

    https://sudonix.com/assets/uploads/files/footer-added.webm

    Hello Mark,

    I just tested the functioning of the scroll bar and I saw this bug:

    https://i.imgur.com/VQw5zw5.mp4

    It should be moved to the left so as not to encroach on the collapse button of the custom footer navbar.

    Then, when we play with the collapse button of the custom footer navbar we should:

    • When the custom footer navbar is deactivated: it sticks to the bottom right while not encroaching on the right sidebar. All this taking into account the collapse of the right sidebar (not obvious, I don’t know if I’m clear 🙂 )

    • When the custom footer navbar is activated: it moves just to the left of the floatright block or can be above the floatright block?

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Keep the good work my friend 😉

    @DownPW said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Nope. The newest version of Harmony appears to have the same pagination as Flarum and Discourse, so it’s been moved into the content area 😁

  • @DownPW said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    The solution may be less difficult to code would be to make a vertical scrollbar inside the right sidebar like in topics. There might be less to manage

    Nope. The newest version of Harmony appears to have the same pagination as Flarum and Discourse, so it’s been moved into the content area 😁

    @phenomlab

    yessss fixed. Love it 😁 😍

  • @phenomlab

    yessss fixed. Love it 😁 😍

    @phenomlab

    No javascript ?

    I wanted to inspect the code but I can’t find any JS

  • @phenomlab

    No javascript ?

    I wanted to inspect the code but I can’t find any JS

    @DownPW it’s definitely there. Won’t work without it 😉

  • @DownPW it’s definitely there. Won’t work without it 😉

    @phenomlab

    I guess, I don’t find it in inspector lol .I will search 🙂

  • @phenomlab

    I guess, I don’t find it in inspector lol .I will search 🙂

    @phenomlab

    Can I test it on my dev env ?

    EDIT: I test it. If you don’t want tell me Mark

    If I have problem, can I ask you @phenomlab ?

  • @phenomlab

    Can I test it on my dev env ?

    EDIT: I test it. If you don’t want tell me Mark

    If I have problem, can I ask you @phenomlab ?

    @DownPW no problems.

  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    @DownPW no problems.

    Seems I miss something 😑 @phenomlab but good start 😉

    [- https://i.imgur.com/cN0YeN0.mp4 -]

    EDIT: Maybe find

    EDIT 2: @phenomlab

    Find --> I have forget toAbove and toBottom css directives
    It’s better now, just seems toBottom doesn’t work :

    b64bdc12-435e-468d-9818-c966b4cbc148-image.png

    .toBottom {
      bottom: 0px !important;
      right: 0px!important;
    }
    
    .toAbove {
      bottom: -5px !important;
      right: 400px !important;
    }
    
  • @phenomlab said in v3 / Harmony diary:

    @DownPW no problems.

    Seems I miss something 😑 @phenomlab but good start 😉

    [- https://i.imgur.com/cN0YeN0.mp4 -]

    EDIT: Maybe find

    EDIT 2: @phenomlab

    Find --> I have forget toAbove and toBottom css directives
    It’s better now, just seems toBottom doesn’t work :

    b64bdc12-435e-468d-9818-c966b4cbc148-image.png

    .toBottom {
      bottom: 0px !important;
      right: 0px!important;
    }
    
    .toAbove {
      bottom: -5px !important;
      right: 400px !important;
    }
    

    @DownPW likely you are missing z-index on that class. As you are using position: absolute the index is needed to bring that specific element forward. By default, it’ll sit behind the progress bar meaning it cannot be clicked, but can be seen.

  • @DownPW likely you are missing z-index on that class. As you are using position: absolute the index is needed to bring that specific element forward. By default, it’ll sit behind the progress bar meaning it cannot be clicked, but can be seen.

    @phenomlab

    Thanks for your reply my friend 😉

    I will test tomorrow and again, it’s a very great job, I like it a lot.

  • @phenomlab

    Thanks for your reply my friend 😉

    I will test tomorrow and again, it’s a very great job, I like it a lot.

    @DownPW no problems. Let me know if you have issues and I can take a look. Can’t release the code formally yet as it’s still beta (and does have very minor bugs).

  • @DownPW no problems. Let me know if you have issues and I can take a look. Can’t release the code formally yet as it’s still beta (and does have very minor bugs).

    Not sure why, but for a while I’ve been looking at the size of the CSS file that runs the dev site, and I couldn’t understand why it was almost twice the size of what it should be in terms of overall lines.

    This eventually got the better of me and I landed up going through the file and removing what appears to be a large amount of duplicated CSS. I primarily work offline using VSCode (my go-to editor), but periodically “fix” things on the fly. The problem with this is that if you make changes online then copy these from the CSS editor in the ACP back to VSCode, they seem to be copied twice - in other words, appended to the existing file despite all text being selected, which should in fact overwrite, but it doesn’t 😱

    Just something for everyone else to watch out for. I spent a fair amount of time this afternoon purging duplicate classes, and the end result is a much leaner file.

  • Not sure why, but for a while I’ve been looking at the size of the CSS file that runs the dev site, and I couldn’t understand why it was almost twice the size of what it should be in terms of overall lines.

    This eventually got the better of me and I landed up going through the file and removing what appears to be a large amount of duplicated CSS. I primarily work offline using VSCode (my go-to editor), but periodically “fix” things on the fly. The problem with this is that if you make changes online then copy these from the CSS editor in the ACP back to VSCode, they seem to be copied twice - in other words, appended to the existing file despite all text being selected, which should in fact overwrite, but it doesn’t 😱

    Just something for everyone else to watch out for. I spent a fair amount of time this afternoon purging duplicate classes, and the end result is a much leaner file.

    Thanks to @cagatay for finding a bug with the CSS in relation to tags in DEV. This has been fixed. I also found another bug whilst addressing this one in the sense that the progress bar on mobile (and desktop, but limited intrusion) shows over the tag div when the composer is active.

    Changed the scrollbar function so that it does not fire if the composer is visible. Here’s the block of code that detects if it’s active or not

                if ($(window).scrollTop() > 0 && (!$('[component="composer"]').is(":visible"))) {
                    bar.addClass('show');
                } else {
                    bar.removeClass('show');
                }
    

    Above, we now have 2 conditions. The first is to fire only if the top marker is higher than 0 - for example, hide if we are at the top of the screen. The second condition is that we also only fire if the composer isn’t active - detected by is(":visible")

    Keep 'em coming in terms of identified bugs - reporting them is much appreciated.

  • Thanks to @cagatay for finding a bug with the CSS in relation to tags in DEV. This has been fixed. I also found another bug whilst addressing this one in the sense that the progress bar on mobile (and desktop, but limited intrusion) shows over the tag div when the composer is active.

    Changed the scrollbar function so that it does not fire if the composer is visible. Here’s the block of code that detects if it’s active or not

                if ($(window).scrollTop() > 0 && (!$('[component="composer"]').is(":visible"))) {
                    bar.addClass('show');
                } else {
                    bar.removeClass('show');
                }
    

    Above, we now have 2 conditions. The first is to fire only if the top marker is higher than 0 - for example, hide if we are at the top of the screen. The second condition is that we also only fire if the composer isn’t active - detected by is(":visible")

    Keep 'em coming in terms of identified bugs - reporting them is much appreciated.

    Hello @phenomlab

    I keep working on my CSS
    On v2, I displayed user groups in topics like this :

    923b452b-29cc-4ca1-82ac-a4348d3f5312-image.png

    but I can’t seem to get any result. I can’t target the right element

    Ideas ?

    Many thanks

  • Hello @phenomlab

    I keep working on my CSS
    On v2, I displayed user groups in topics like this :

    923b452b-29cc-4ca1-82ac-a4348d3f5312-image.png

    but I can’t seem to get any result. I can’t target the right element

    Ideas ?

    Many thanks

    @DownPW hmm. Haven’t tried this myself (yet) but will have a look later this afternoon.


Related Topics
  • 3 Votes
    1 Posts
    635 Views
    No one has replied
  • New Code Repository

    Announcements code gist github
    2
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    979 Views
    @phenomlab very nice and useful idea [image: bravo-xd.gif]
  • 2 Votes
    2 Posts
    685 Views
    @dave1904 that’s a really good point actually. I know it was there previously on Persona, but you’re right - no such function exists on harmony. However, putting something in place to mimick the behaviour of Persona won’t be hard from the js standpoint, although I wonder if perhaps we should ask the NodeBB developers is this feature was overlooked?
  • NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance nodebb 1.19.3 performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    10k Views
    @phenomlab I find the problem Mark The error message indicated this path : http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u I change the path url on config.json [image: 1645128773854-47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png] And all it’s good Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3 But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok
  • [NodeBB] Import custom Font

    Solved Customisation custom fonts nodebb css
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    @cagatay you’ll need to define this in the body tag (or another element if you want greater or more granular targets) - for example body { font-family: "Poppins"; font-size: 16px; } Essentially, you use the font-size CSS directive.
  • Iframely (Nodebb)

    Solved Configure
    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    9k Views
    @DownPW This is now resolved. The issue was an incorrect URL specified in the Nodebb plugin. I’ve corrected this, and now it works as intended.
  • Easier to read code and pre blocks

    Announcements code pre
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    635 Views
    No one has replied
  • Platform development diary

    Announcements technology platform new
    9
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    It’s been a while since I checked in here. Plenty going on - mostly around rectifying small pockets of resistance between light and dark modes, plus the addition of new features such as an enhanced reputation system and the ability to create polls. Plus, there are several changes going on under the hood which are completely transparent to users or the operation of the platform. However, some changes mean that the platform does need to be restarted for code changes to stick and function correctly. I tend to do this during non busy periods, but sometimes, it’s unfortunately inevitable. The good news is that in most cases, a full restart takes only 20 seconds. More to come