Skip to content

Page control arrows for PWA

Solved Customisation
27 2 9.2k 1
  • @crazycells I think I found a bug. If you position a topic between the two navigation arrows on a mobile device, you cannot click that topic until you scroll up or down past the arrows. I noticed this last night and will address it.

  • A better explanation of that is below

    image.png

    As you can see from the developer view, the width: 100%; sits over the top of the topic meaning it cannot be clicked or tapped. A workaround here should be to set z-index: -1; on the navigation class, but whilst that resolves the ordering issue, it means the navigation buttons no longer work as they sit under the content.

  • Fixed. Change the CSS block (original post is also updated) to the below

    /* START - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
        
    .arrow {
      width: 40px;
      height: 40px;
      background-color: var(--bs-body-bg);
      text-align: center;
      line-height: 30px;
      cursor: pointer;
      font-size: 30px;
      border: 1px solid var(--bs-border-color);
      border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        top: 50%;
    }
    .arrow.right {
        position: fixed;
        right: 0;
    }
    
    /* END - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
    
  • I have not tested them in details yet, but I will let you know about any bugs for sure 👍🏼

    Additionally, is there any reason that they are in the middle but not close to the bottom? That is usually where the fingers will be

  • I have not tested them in details yet, but I will let you know about any bugs for sure 👍🏼

    Additionally, is there any reason that they are in the middle but not close to the bottom? That is usually where the fingers will be

    @crazycells They can be anywhere you’d prefer. You can just change the .arrow.left, .arrow.right class to move to the preferred position. Currently, it’s set at 50%, but can be any value you want to reach the desired position. In this case, it would probably be better to substitute top for bottom and set the position in px to ensure the placement is the same no matter which screen estate you have.

    For example

    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        bottom: 120px;
    }
    

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another. That would be a minor alteration to the scroll top function to have it not appear on posts.

  • @crazycells They can be anywhere you’d prefer. You can just change the .arrow.left, .arrow.right class to move to the preferred position. Currently, it’s set at 50%, but can be any value you want to reach the desired position. In this case, it would probably be better to substitute top for bottom and set the position in px to ensure the placement is the same no matter which screen estate you have.

    For example

    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        bottom: 120px;
    }
    

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another. That would be a minor alteration to the scroll top function to have it not appear on posts.

    @phenomlab thanks, yes, I will move them close to the menu bar, but I was asking in case there is a technical detail I was not aware…

  • @phenomlab thanks, yes, I will move them close to the menu bar, but I was asking in case there is a technical detail I was not aware…

    @crazycells No, none that I am aware of - move them to where you’d prefer. In fact, I took your advice and moved them on Sudonix, which uses the CSS class I added in the previous post.

  • @crazycells No, none that I am aware of - move them to where you’d prefer. In fact, I took your advice and moved them on Sudonix, which uses the CSS class I added in the previous post.

    @phenomlab yes, I believe this looks more natural, they are closer to the fingers and on the top of these, it is not blocking any content in the middle of the screen…

  • @phenomlab yes, I believe this looks more natural, they are closer to the fingers and on the top of these, it is not blocking any content in the middle of the screen…

    @crazycells Exactly. i’m going to hire you as a design guru! You have some great ideas on what Sudonix should look like and I’m grateful for any contribution that enhances what I hope is already a good experience.

  • @crazycells Exactly. i’m going to hire you as a design guru! You have some great ideas on what Sudonix should look like and I’m grateful for any contribution that enhances what I hope is already a good experience.

    @phenomlab It is nice to hear that I am able to contribute your website 😄

  • @crazycells They can be anywhere you’d prefer. You can just change the .arrow.left, .arrow.right class to move to the preferred position. Currently, it’s set at 50%, but can be any value you want to reach the desired position. In this case, it would probably be better to substitute top for bottom and set the position in px to ensure the placement is the same no matter which screen estate you have.

    For example

    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        bottom: 120px;
    }
    

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another. That would be a minor alteration to the scroll top function to have it not appear on posts.

    @phenomlab said in Page control arrows for PWA:

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another.

    Based on the above point made, I have now disabled the scroll to top button inside topics.

  • @phenomlab said in Page control arrows for PWA:

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another.

    Based on the above point made, I have now disabled the scroll to top button inside topics.

    @phenomlab this works great! thanks a lot. And thanks to your JS codes, it is only activated on PWA, not on mobile…

  • @phenomlab this works great! thanks a lot. And thanks to your JS codes, it is only activated on PWA, not on mobile…

    @crazycells Not sure if you are using the scroll-top function, but if you are, I have enhanced the position of the button and re-sized it to match the forward and back arrows as below

    bd290755-5232-4a4c-9801-aa23235c1563-image.png

    The scroll-top button is located on the bottom right.

  • @crazycells Not sure if you are using the scroll-top function, but if you are, I have enhanced the position of the button and re-sized it to match the forward and back arrows as below

    bd290755-5232-4a4c-9801-aa23235c1563-image.png

    The scroll-top button is located on the bottom right.

    @phenomlab yes I used it before but not very frequently… Maybe you should put it above… just because it is more intuitive…
    ^
    < >
    v

  • @phenomlab yes I used it before but not very frequently… Maybe you should put it above… just because it is more intuitive…
    ^
    < >
    v

    @crazycells Ok, but there’s no “scroll-down” 🙂

  • @crazycells Ok, but there’s no “scroll-down” 🙂

    @phenomlab yeah , I know 😄 not necessary, but “up” should be above right/left buttons I guess… that is how people would think…

  • @phenomlab yeah , I know 😄 not necessary, but “up” should be above right/left buttons I guess… that is how people would think…

    @crazycells Good point, thanks.

  • @crazycells Ok, but there’s no “scroll-down” 🙂

    @phenomlab but I guess “up” is on mobile, right? not PWA specific?

  • @phenomlab but I guess “up” is on mobile, right? not PWA specific?

    @crazycells it is, yes - I think I’ll leave it as there is no specific PWA CSS classes I know of. Well, you could use something like the below, but this means multiple CSS files for different operating systems.

    /**
    * Determine the mobile operating system.
    * This function returns one of 'iOS', 'Android', 'Windows Phone', or 'unknown'.
    *
    * @returns {String}
    */
    
    function getMobileOperatingSystem()
    {
      var userAgent = navigator.userAgent || navigator.vendor || window.opera;
      // Windows Phone must come first because its UA also contains "Android"
      if (/windows phone/i.test(userAgent))
      {
        return  "Windows Phone";
      }
    
      if (/android/i.test(userAgent))
      {
        return  "Android";
      }
    
      if (/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(userAgent) && !window.MSStream)
      {
        return  "iOS";
      }
    
      return  "unknown";
      // return “Android” - one should either handle the unknown or fallback to a specific platform, let’s say Android
    }
    

    Once you’re in that rabbit hole, it’s impossible to get out of it.


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • 14 Votes
    17 Posts
    3k Views
    No problem dude ! I hope you have a good vacation. Enjoy your loved ones!
  • Fixed background to nodebb forum

    Solved Configure nodebb
    25
    4 Votes
    25 Posts
    6k Views
    @Panda said in Fixed background to nodebb forum: Chatgpt told me the ::before method. Go figure
  • nodebb-plugin-custom-pages

    Solved Customisation plugin custom-pages
    5
    2
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    @DownPW it’s possible, yes, but you may inadvertently end up targeting other elements using the same class which of course isn’t desired. Can you provide a link in DM for me to review?
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    949 Views
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • Composer options on nodebb

    Solved Configure nodebb
    8
    1
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda You should be able to expose the CSS for these using F12 to get into console [image: 1686833368846-3591518c-e3a3-4ada-a43c-6b32a5e0359c-image.png] [image: 1686833399483-a2b8ed46-4157-4ff2-85f0-576543380107-image.png] That should then expose the element once selected [image: 1686833431032-89d9c545-a47a-40d1-98f4-80cf3b958e8f-image.png] Here’s the below CSS you need based on the screenshot provided. .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="picture-o"], .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="spoiler"] { display: none; }
  • Fresher in Nodebb install

    General nodebb
    24
    15 Votes
    24 Posts
    7k Views
    @Hari I’ve been reading a lot about APO. Looks impressive.
  • fading in /tags page

    Solved Customisation nodebb
    32
    1
    30 Votes
    32 Posts
    9k Views
    Fix working perfectly
  • [NODEBB] Reply Button/arrow answer

    Solved Customisation css nodebb
    25
    4
    4 Votes
    25 Posts
    8k Views
    Topic open https://sudonix.com/topic/207/nodebb-help-for-my-custom-css