Skip to content

Network Security Monitoring

Learning
7 2 2.7k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I am wondering what everyone is using for network security monitoring? I did a good search and there are so many options. I was also wondering if it is worth running a network monitoring software on a local network? Maybe it isn’t even worth running a tool like that on a local network? I don’t think people are trying to break into my local network, but was curious what others do.

    Say I have virtual servers running that have the network card bridged. Is it worth having monitoring software installed and running for them as well?

  • wrote on last edited by Madchatthew
    #2

    I found this video that monitors all sorts of things over the network. Hardware and such as well. He goes over and how to setup Whats Up Gold. It is free for your personal network and for business it costs money of course.

    Thoughts?

    @phenomlab if you don’t want videos like this on your site let me know and I won’t do that for future posts. You can also remove the video from this post as well if not allowed.

  • I am wondering what everyone is using for network security monitoring? I did a good search and there are so many options. I was also wondering if it is worth running a network monitoring software on a local network? Maybe it isn’t even worth running a tool like that on a local network? I don’t think people are trying to break into my local network, but was curious what others do.

    Say I have virtual servers running that have the network card bridged. Is it worth having monitoring software installed and running for them as well?

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #3

    @Madchatthew certainly worth monitoring, but for it to work correctly, the bridge card needs to be running in promiscuous mode otherwise packets will be discarded by the NIC itself.

    Are you looking specifically for security monitoring, or general performance monitoring also? I know that @DownPW has a lot of experience with Crowdstrike but that is essentially application layer rather than machine, so in the sense of the OSI model, it’s layer 7.

    I suspect you are looking for layer 1 or 2 which would be physical (1) or data (2). There are numerous security products out there (some really good open source ones also) but I prefer to tap into the network stream at layer 3, so in this example, you’d use a network switch and create a network tap or mirroring port and use another program to read and analyse that traffic.

    Taking this route means it’s agentless, and you don’t have to add machines manually. Really depends on what your requirements are.

  • I found this video that monitors all sorts of things over the network. Hardware and such as well. He goes over and how to setup Whats Up Gold. It is free for your personal network and for business it costs money of course.

    Thoughts?

    @phenomlab if you don’t want videos like this on your site let me know and I won’t do that for future posts. You can also remove the video from this post as well if not allowed.

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #4

    @Madchatthew absolutely no issue. Including any source material such as videos is actively encouraged as it saves other members having to search themselves.

  • @Madchatthew certainly worth monitoring, but for it to work correctly, the bridge card needs to be running in promiscuous mode otherwise packets will be discarded by the NIC itself.

    Are you looking specifically for security monitoring, or general performance monitoring also? I know that @DownPW has a lot of experience with Crowdstrike but that is essentially application layer rather than machine, so in the sense of the OSI model, it’s layer 7.

    I suspect you are looking for layer 1 or 2 which would be physical (1) or data (2). There are numerous security products out there (some really good open source ones also) but I prefer to tap into the network stream at layer 3, so in this example, you’d use a network switch and create a network tap or mirroring port and use another program to read and analyse that traffic.

    Taking this route means it’s agentless, and you don’t have to add machines manually. Really depends on what your requirements are.

    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @phenomlab To be honest, I didn’t really know what I am looking for or what level of monitoring I should do or if I even need to do any monitoring. I know with what seems like an increase in hacking lately, that maybe it wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

    I do like the sound of layer 3 monitoring so you don’t have to manually add machines. Do you have some examples of some of the open source software out there that does the layer 1 or 2 monitoring?

    @phenomlab said in Network Security Monitoring:

    @Madchatthew absolutely no issue. Including any source material such as videos is actively encouraged as it saves other members having to search themselves.

    Sounds good, thank you!

  • @phenomlab To be honest, I didn’t really know what I am looking for or what level of monitoring I should do or if I even need to do any monitoring. I know with what seems like an increase in hacking lately, that maybe it wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

    I do like the sound of layer 3 monitoring so you don’t have to manually add machines. Do you have some examples of some of the open source software out there that does the layer 1 or 2 monitoring?

    @phenomlab said in Network Security Monitoring:

    @Madchatthew absolutely no issue. Including any source material such as videos is actively encouraged as it saves other members having to search themselves.

    Sounds good, thank you!

    wrote on last edited by phenomlab
    #6

    @Madchatthew You could try this, but the hardware specs are insane.

    https://github.com/telekom-security/tpotce

    I’d couple this with Zabbix, which is an open source monitoring platform, but mostly geared towards operational monitoring rather than security.

    For that, take a look at OSSEC

    https://www.ossec.net/

  • @Madchatthew You could try this, but the hardware specs are insane.

    https://github.com/telekom-security/tpotce

    I’d couple this with Zabbix, which is an open source monitoring platform, but mostly geared towards operational monitoring rather than security.

    For that, take a look at OSSEC

    https://www.ossec.net/

    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @phenomlab I will check those out. Thanks for sharing. I appreciate it!


Related Topics
  • 2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Muhammad-Abdan-Farooqui Welcome! i’m currently using (and recommend) Bitdefender. For my sins, I’m using Windows, but need this for teams and Office365 integration (otherwise I’d always choose Linux). Have you looked at the Bitdefender product for MAC? https://www.bitdefender.com/en-gb/consumer/antivirus-for-mac
  • 3 Votes
    4 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    I’ve been using this service for a couple of days now, and it’s made my internet access so much faster. That alone is a plus, and I never thought there would be a contender for Cloudflare in this area.
  • Bad information security advice

    Security linkedin security advice
    1
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    792 Views
    No one has replied
  • 12 Votes
    8 Posts
    9k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells good question. Gmail being provided by Google is going to be one of the more secure by default out of the box, although you have to bear in mind that you can have the best security in the world, but that is easily diluted by user decision. Obviously, it makes sense to secure all cloud based services with at least 2fa protection, or better still, biometric if available, but email still remains vastly unprotected (unless enforced in the sense of 2fa, which I know Sendgrid do) because of user choice (in the sense that users will always go for the path of least resistance when it comes to security to make their lives easier). The ultimate side effect of taking this route is being vulnerable to credentials theft via phishing attacks and social engineering. The same principle would easily apply to Proton Mail, who also (from memory) do not enforce 2fa. Based on this fact, neither product is more secure than the other without one form of additional authentication at least being imposed. In terms of direct attack on the servers holding mail accounts themselves, this is a far less common type of attack these days as tricking the user is so much simpler than brute forcing a server where you are very likely to be detected by perimeter security (IDS / IPS etc).
  • 5 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    Missed out on this deal ? Windscribe offer a limited free version. More about that here https://sudonix.org/topic/13/which-product-is-the-best-for-vpn/164?_=1652206628456
  • IRC Server/Client - Chat App with NodeBB

    Linux nodebb irc server client
    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @Hari not sure from the consumer perspective, but Skype has been all but completely consumed by Microsoft Teams when it comes to business usage.
  • Changing Passwords Regularly Actually Weakens Security

    Blog security blog
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Wasting a scammer's time is hugely entertaining

    Blog security blog
    1
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied