Omitir al contenido

Clustering for NodeBB enabled

Announcements
22 4 3.3k 1
  • @Madchatthew I think there’s always that same danger no matter which open source solution you go for. By its very definition, open source comes at significant cost to the maintainer in terms of time, effort, and knowhow, so they often release a paid version of the product as a means of recovering some of that invested time in the form of revenue.

    It’s when the commercial product requires more attention than the open source version that causes conflicts, and that version is often the casualty.

    @phenomlab said in Clustering for NodeBB enabled:

    @Madchatthew I think there’s always that same danger no matter which open source solution you go for. By its very definition, open source comes at significant cost to the maintainer in terms of time, effort, and knowhow, so they often release a paid version of the product as a means of recovering some of that invested time in the form of revenue.

    It’s when the commercial product requires more attention than the open source version that causes conflicts, and that version is often the casualty.

    This makes sense. Then unless you can get some people to help you maintain and update the code you are doing it all yourself and that takes up time to not being able to implement new features and now you are using more resources because you have more people helping and such. It all multiplies and pretty soon you either have to abandon it or come up with a way to make money to keep everything going.

  • @phenomlab said in Clustering for NodeBB enabled:

    @Madchatthew I think there’s always that same danger no matter which open source solution you go for. By its very definition, open source comes at significant cost to the maintainer in terms of time, effort, and knowhow, so they often release a paid version of the product as a means of recovering some of that invested time in the form of revenue.

    It’s when the commercial product requires more attention than the open source version that causes conflicts, and that version is often the casualty.

    This makes sense. Then unless you can get some people to help you maintain and update the code you are doing it all yourself and that takes up time to not being able to implement new features and now you are using more resources because you have more people helping and such. It all multiplies and pretty soon you either have to abandon it or come up with a way to make money to keep everything going.

    @Madchatthew True. I think this is the reason as to why most Open Source projects are abandoned because they are not sustainable in the long-term.


Related Topics
  • 14 Votos
    9 Mensajes
    997 Visitas
    @DownPW of course. As I mentioned in the first post, Sudonix isn’t going anywhere. It’ll continue to be free as it always has been.
  • Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!

    Announcements themes layout
    16
    2
    15 Votos
    16 Mensajes
    2k Visitas
    @phenomlab of course, to be recognised is fantastic. @phenomlab said in Ch..ch..ch..ch..changes!: Sadly, no. Web crawlers and scrapers are often JS based and read text only, so styles don’t have any bearing. I’ve read mixed things about this, but no that does make sense, it was something I read a many years back when using Wordpress.
  • Planned sunset of NTFY plugin

    Fijo Announcements push nodebb ntfy
    7
    1
    8 Votos
    7 Mensajes
    1k Visitas
    I’ve noticed that I’m the only one subscribed to the push notifications on this site. If you were using NTFY previously, and have noticed that you’ve not had any alerts for a while, it’s because this feature has been disabled. You’ll now need to use the push notification to replace NTFY as mentioned in the first post.
  • ANNOUCEMENT: New NTFY Server

    Announcements ntfy push alerts
    9
    1
    7 Votos
    9 Mensajes
    2k Visitas
    @crazycells that’s as good a test as any
  • NodeBB v3

    Announcements nodebb v3 nodebb
    2
    3 Votos
    2 Mensajes
    770 Visitas
    @cagatay JS will work fine - no changes there, and there are no plans to drop support for jQuery. More of an issue is the CSS - for which there are quite a few breaking changes. Keep an eye on sudonix.dev (my development site) where you can see progress in relation to how I am tackling the compatibility issues.
  • Ghost for blogging vs long posts on nodeBB?

    Announcements
    4
    2 Votos
    4 Mensajes
    2k Visitas
    @Hari I get that load speed with NodeBB alone 🤭
  • Testing out Webdock.io

    Movido Announcements webdock recovery speed
    2
    5
    5 Votos
    2 Mensajes
    1k Visitas
    Just coming back to this thread for review (as I often do), and it looks like Webdock have increased their available offerings - some are extremely powerful, yet very competitive from the pricing perspective. [image: 1692559685163-7cf9a928-ac21-44fe-99c6-90439030d631-image.png] 10 CPU cores, plus 20Gb RAM? Well worth a look (and the asking price) - there’s also a fixed IP which is hugely beneficial. Clearly, this is well beyond what most people will want to spend - it’s more of an example (but interestingly, Sudonix runs on something not too different from the above). However, not all that glitters is gold - just have a walk through the benchmark report I found below and you’ll see a huge difference between Heztner and Webdock https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/compare/hetzner_vs_webdock That being said, the amount of HTTP requests that Webdock handles in relation to Hetzner is superior - @DownPW you might want to have a look at this - there’s a free 24 hour trial… [image: 1692560710486-5203639b-2f62-47e6-b87b-37580ce5deae-image.png]
  • Fancybox now used for image handling

    Announcements fancybox
    16
    6 Votos
    16 Mensajes
    3k Visitas
    And it seems to be less conflicting!