Skip to content

Post Style View

Solved Customisation
67 3 22.8k 2
  • @cagatay Thanks for confirming. Just finishing up the jQuery functions so if you are logged in as admin, the page might reload a few times, but this is expected

  • @cagatay Seems fine to me ?

    25678c08-ae90-4da6-95a5-c3b1229e7e08-image.png

  • @cagatay Seems fine to me ?

    25678c08-ae90-4da6-95a5-c3b1229e7e08-image.png

    @phenomlab pls refresh?

  • @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

  • @cagatay I have. No issues on my side

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    @cagatay No problems. I checked this in an incognito session also, with no issues

    748735c8-4141-4185-9d46-4eb3f8023744-image.png

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you 🙂

    @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

  • @cagatay said in Post Style View:

    maybe it depends on me or my web browser. thank you

    One thing I have noticed is that there are a number of errors on your site in the console. My concern here is that the jQuery functions I added are not being executed. For example, I removed the below function from your site about 30 minutes ago because it’s malformed

    });ment).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
        	if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
        		var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
        		var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
        		tags.append(bar);
        		
        		var max;
        		
        		setTimeout(function() {
            		tags.each(function() {
            		   var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
            		   var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
            		   max = max > val ? max : val;
            		   
            		   bar.css({
            		       width: val / max * 100 + '%'
            		   });
            		});
        		}, 100)
        	}
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    As you can see, this isn’t right at all. It should be

    $(document).ready(function () {
        function animateTags() {
            if (ajaxify.data.template.name === 'categories') {
                var tags = $('.popular-tags .tag-item');
                var bar = $('<div class="popular-tags-bar"></div>');
                tags.append(bar);
    
                var max;
    
                setTimeout(function () {
                    tags.each(function () {
                        var bar = $(this).find('.popular-tags-bar');
                        var val = parseInt(bar.parents('a').find('.tag-topic-count').text(), 10);
                        max = max > val ? max : val;
    
                        bar.css({
                            width: val / max * 100 + '%'
                        });
                    });
                }, 100);
            }
        }
        animateTags();
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', animateTags);
    });
    

    I’ve put this back how it should be, but am curious as to where that came from.

    @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

  • @phenomlab i can not understand how it can be, i do not touch anything js side.

    so now everything is working and code is okey hope so?

    @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

  • @cagatay Not entirely. There is an ajax call I need to use called action:ajaxify.loaded but this does not seem to be firing on your site. It’s opposite, action:ajaxify.end works fine (as you’ll see if you press F5) but the former does not, and I can’t see any reason as to why.

    @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

  • @phenomlab maybe it depends on my nodebb version or really i can not say anything coz i don not know what is the ajax code as well 🙂

    @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

  • @cagatay Your NodeBB is up to date, so not an issue there. Just seems odd that no matter what I try, it doesn’t trigger. Investigating

    @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Not sure, but will check out a theory I have first before we go down that route.

  • @phenomlab maybe there is a problem in my vps or ubuntu is not clearlu working or library etc…

    @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

  • @phenomlab i checked topic with a lots of posts 3 times 🙂 everything is clear and very well now. thank you your effort.

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

  • @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

  • @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    @cagatay No problems. Glad it’s all working. I need to document this for others to be able to use.

    this post is very good document for the users who will want to use it 🙂

    @cagatay Yes, but I want to create something more concise and simpler to follow

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved on
  • @cagatay Found the issue. It appears that the hook I should be calling is in fact action:posts.loaded and not action:ajaxify.loaded 🤦

    Should be fixed now but take a look. The best way to test this is to find a topic with lots of posts, and scroll to the bottom. Then, reload the page, and start scrolling up from the bottom to the top. As the new posts are added into the DOM, that function I wrote should execute and add the missing class

    For anyone else following this thread, the two required jQuery functions are

        $(window).on('action:posts.loaded', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("New posts detected,so adding classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $(document).ready(function() {
            if ($('li[component="post"]').hasClass("")) {
                console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                $('li[component="post"]').addClass('topic-response-post');
            }
        });
    });
    

    @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    
  • @cagatay in case you’re still following this thread, I found a far more efficient way of adding the classes using jQuery. To this end, you can change this block above with this code

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.end', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
        $(window).on('action:ajaxify.loaded', function(data) {
            $('li[component="post"]').each(function(i, obj) {
                if (!$(this).hasClass('self-post') || (!$(this).hasClass('self-post'))) {
                    console.log("Adding required classes for messenger type view");
                    $(this).addClass('topic-response-post');
                }
    
            });
        });
    });
    

    @phenomlab said in Post Style View:

    // Target those elements already loaded in the DOM
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.end’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });
    // Target elements dynamically added to the DOM on post load
    $(document).ready(function() {
    $(window).on(‘action:ajaxify.loaded’, function(data) {
    $(‘li[component=“post”]’).each(function(i, obj) {
    if (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’) || (!$(this).hasClass(‘self-post’))) {
    console.log(“Adding required classes for messenger type view”);
    $(this).addClass(‘topic-response-post’);
    }

        });
    });
    

    });

    thank you Mark.
    changed it.


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Please help me, I can't install nodebb

    Locked Solved Customisation nodebb
    7
    5 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    Installation completed, verified, and tested. Correct installation methodology is below https://docs.nodebb.org/installing/os/ubuntu/
  • Sudonix and fediverse

    Solved Customisation sudonix
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    @Panda said in Sudonix and fediverse: Federation will have huge advantages, especially for starting off forums that would otherwise be quiet, because it can bring in posts from similar sites to increase content. Can’t say I agree with this statement. To me, if I visit a new forum, I’d much rather be viewing original content rather than that which I can easily consume elsewhere. I understand that new forums are often empty with not much content, but the growth needs to be organic rather than ingested from elsewhere to make it look busy. Using RSS feeds to pull in content from remote sites is fine as long as you use it for reading reference and create a discussion around the topic you are referring to (as I do with Sudonix), but absolutely pointless if you include the entire article and all associated responses - you may as well just visit the origin site instead. Another issue is SEO and the impact duplicated content will have on your own forum when it comes to Google indexing your site. Duplicated content negatively impacts SEO and in addition, that same content may be proprietary meaning you need permission to include it on your site. Potentially, it’s a legal minefield which should be treated with trepidation to ensure no copyright infringement takes place.
  • Bug Report

    Solved Bugs nodebb bugs
    47
    1
    26 Votes
    47 Posts
    12k Views
    @crazycells Good points, thanks. I completely forgot that classes are added - makes life much simpler! EDIT - seems this is pretty straightforward, and only needs the below CSS .upvoted i { color: var(--bs-user-level) !important; } This then yields [image: 1718028529465-3f072f8a-ebfa-4910-8723-73c493b8e4eb-image.png] However, the caveat here is that the .upvoted class will only show for your upvotes, and nobody else’s. However, this does satisfy the original request however I would love to see my upvoted posts more clearly, because currently, when I upvote, nothing on the post tool is changing, it would be nicer if there is an indication that I have upvoted (like a filled or colored triangle?)
  • 5 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    @DownPW thanks. I forgot about that.
  • www. Infront stops website access?

    Solved Configure nodebb
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda because there is no match for the DNS entry specified. The receiving web server parses the headers looking for a destination hostname to match, and anything the web server is unable to resolve will be sent back to the root.
  • SEO and Nodebb

    Performance nodebb seo
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365 And also https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164 It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”. Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.
  • 4 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    @Panda said in Upgrade to NodeBB v3? 2BB or not 2BB, that is the question!: So although thats a plugin it has Widget like element and stopped working on the Theme change Which is normal based on the widgets being reset when you change themes.
  • [NodeBB] Creating new user to auto post content

    Solved Customisation
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    @phenomlab many thanks Mark .