Skip to content

Which Swatch are you using or prefer?

Announcements

Related Topics
  • IMPORTANT: Theme / Swatch changes

    Announcements
    4
    6 Votes
    4 Posts
    276 Views

    @cagatay these changes aren’t published anywhere presently, so nothing for you to do.

  • Swatch / Theme Changer

    Code Respository
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views

    @veronikya it might flicker on load, yes, and that’s normal. It’s because the CSS and JS are loaded before the custom elements, but it shouldn’t be too bad on reasonable links.

    It shouldn’t flicker at all navigating through the site though as the CSS and JS are already loaded.

  • Theme retirement

    Announcements
    21
    16 Votes
    21 Posts
    1k Views

    I relented somewhat here and added another swatch - one I missed, which was previous called “blackout”. This specific one has been adapted to work on the new theming engine, but the others have been reclassified, and renamed to suit.

    image.png

    As a result, the theme you might have had will probably be reflecting something else, so you (might) need to change your themes accordingly. The changes are as follows

    Light -> No Change
    Cloudy -> Is now the old “Dim”
    Dim -> Is now the old “Dark”
    Dark -> Now a new theme based on the revamped “Blackout”

  • OGProxy - a replacement for iFramely

    Announcements
    32
    33 Votes
    32 Posts
    2k Views

    @DownPW Coming soon…

  • NodeBB: Creating the Swatch modes

    Solved Configure
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    185 Views

    @mventures the swatch feature you refer to isn’t a NodeBB plugin, but a utility that I wrote that handles this. It is available for v2 (as you can see here) but I’ve stopped developing and releasing the code because it has been entirely rewritten to work for v3.

    If you’d like the code, this is possible, but you’ll need to upgrade to v3 first.

  • Clustering for NodeBB enabled

    Announcements
    22
    15 Votes
    22 Posts
    284 Views

    @Madchatthew True. I think this is the reason as to why most Open Source projects are abandoned because they are not sustainable in the long-term.

  • Testing out Webdock.io

    Moved Announcements
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    520 Views

    Just coming back to this thread for review (as I often do), and it looks like Webdock have increased their available offerings - some are extremely powerful, yet very competitive from the pricing perspective.

    image.png

    10 CPU cores, plus 20Gb RAM? Well worth a look (and the asking price) - there’s also a fixed IP which is hugely beneficial.

    Clearly, this is well beyond what most people will want to spend - it’s more of an example (but interestingly, Sudonix runs on something not too different from the above).

    However, not all that glitters is gold 😕 - just have a walk through the benchmark report I found below and you’ll see a huge difference between Heztner and Webdock

    https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/compare/hetzner_vs_webdock

    That being said, the amount of HTTP requests that Webdock handles in relation to Hetzner is superior - @DownPW you might want to have a look at this - there’s a free 24 hour trial… 🙂

    5203639b-2f62-47e6-b87b-37580ce5deae-image.png

  • Fancybox now used for image handling

    Announcements
    16
    6 Votes
    16 Posts
    939 Views

    And it seems to be less conflicting!