Skip to content

Want to use Sudonix themes ?

Chitchat
  • Mark hi,
    after upgrading 3.9 i have some problems with my web site.
    Pls see below photos of my problems;

    image.png

    Also recent post and topics options i dont see my header

    image.png

  • @cagatay This will be because of the below changes

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/18292/nodebb-3.9.0

    It’s related to the brand header section here

    <button type="button" class="btn-ghost-sm d-flex gap-2 dropdown-toggle" data-bs-toggle="dropdown"
    

    It needs to be changed to

    <button type="button" class="btn btn-ghost btn-sm d-flex gap-2 dropdown-toggle" data-bs-toggle="dropdown"
    

    I’ve made this change on your site, but you’ll also need some additional CSS. This ought to do it, and it’s been also applied to your forum.

    .btn-ghost {
        --bs-btn-hover-border-color: var(--bs-body-navbar-active);
        --bs-btn-active-bg: var(--bs-body-navbar-active);
    }
    
  • Of course, I am the same problem I have change the css class button on widget brand Header

    except that I had an offset present on the brand header.

    I did the same manipulations but I cannot remove this shift that we see on the screen.

    Any idea how to remove this @phenomlab ?

    Before :
    daed0cbc-7791-44eb-a1c1-28e4168051e4-image.png

    After upgrade :

    1d3ffc95-51eb-43f6-beef-df34161af0da-image.png

  • @DownPW Is this on your live site, or development? I cannot see any issue?

    EDIT - I see it on your DEV site. Not sure where the additional padding is coming from to be honest, but one quick “fix” would be to target this CSS

    [type=button]:not(:disabled), [type=reset]:not(:disabled), [type=submit]:not(:disabled), button:not(:disabled)
    

    And use this

    [type=button]:not(:disabled), [type=reset]:not(:disabled), [type=submit]:not(:disabled), button:not(:disabled) {
        cursor: pointer;
        margin-top: 0.5rem;
        margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
    }
    

    I think you may have added

    button.btn.btn-ghost.btn-sm.d-flex.gap-2 {
        padding-top: 0.8rem;
    }
    

    Although this isn’t very elegant as padding will in fact make the button much larger.

  • yep in dev, always for test before upgrade prod 😉

    @phenomlab said in Want to use Sudonix themes ?:

    I think you may have added

    button.btn.btn-ghost.btn-sm.d-flex.gap-2 {
    padding-top: 0.8rem;
    }

    Yep you’re right my friends.

    But your method seems better :

    [type=button]:not(:disabled), [type=reset]:not(:disabled), [type=submit]:not(:disabled), button:not(:disabled) {
        cursor: pointer;
        margin-top: 0.5rem;
        margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
    }
    

    Thanks

    EDIT : ha noooo your code broke the “Answer” Button

    96be1a13-ad61-4065-b02d-4ef2b4a85b0c-image.png

    keep for now this code

    button.btn.btn-ghost.btn-sm.d-flex.gap-2 {
    padding-top: 0.8rem;
    }

  • @DownPW that’s because it’s targeting the button type. Just change the post button class.

  • hmm sorry don’t understand

    Edit :

    like this maybe ?

    .btn.btn-ghost.btn-sm:not(:disabled) {
        cursor: pointer;
        margin-top: 0.5rem;
        margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
    }
    
  • @DownPW Yes, that will work fine. What I meant was that the original CSS I provided targets [type=button] so would impact all others on the page in addition to the intended target.

  • @phenomlab i have some problems with my below items when selected this type of tree;

    image.png

  • @cagatay In your CSS, locate the block starting

    .category-card .text-muted.timeago
    

    And remove

    margin-left: -180px;
    
  • Mark hi,

    I know that you also update your own css and js along with nodebb’s updates but mine is old one when we first set it up.

    I would like to your help to use your current css and js codes if its possible?

    Thank you for your helping.

  • @cagatay

    @cagatay said in Want to use Sudonix themes ?:

    I know that you also update your own css and js along with nodebb’s updates

    I do update the CSS and JS here, but it’s not in line with NodeBB releases. All of the code I have written will work with prior releases, with the exception of Chat Threading, which requires a specific hook not present in some early versions. Again, this would still work, but not at full capacity.

    @cagatay said in Want to use Sudonix themes ?:

    mine is old one when we first set it up

    It’s not “old” - it just isn’t the latest code. In fact, the code running on your website is not advertised anywhere else, so in fact, is newer than the Git links in this post.

    @cagatay said in Want to use Sudonix themes ?:

    I would like to your help to use your current css and js codes if its possible?

    Possible, yes, but not yet. There are still some bugs in the code branch I’m using here, and I don’t want to introduce complexities into your installation - particularly when I know they exist, and you’d be left with issues that your users then have to put up with.

  • thank you for your advise Mark.
    may i use your font ? what i have to do for it?

  • @cagatay you are already using it.

  • i have many minor problems shown below photo, how can i fix it?
    Chrome is moving towards a new experience that lets people make an informed choice with respect to third-party cookies.

    image.png

  • @cagatay This isn’t related to NodeBB, but how the Chrome browser itself behaves - see below

    Yes, Google Chrome is shifting towards a more privacy-focused approach, particularly in how it handles third-party cookies. This change is part of a broader industry trend towards improving user privacy and transparency, as seen in regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

    Key elements of Chrome’s new approach include:

    • Phasing out third-party cookies: Chrome has been working on a plan to phase out third-party cookies entirely, which are often used by advertisers and trackers to follow users across websites. This is part of Google’s Privacy Sandbox initiative.

    • User control and transparency: Chrome will provide users with more detailed options and controls over how third-party cookies are used. This will allow users to make an informed decision about which cookies they want to allow or block, helping them better understand how their data is being used.

    • Privacy Sandbox: Instead of third-party cookies, Google is introducing alternatives, like FLoC (Federated Learning of Cohorts), which aims to deliver relevant ads without exposing individual users’ browsing history to advertisers. FLoC is part of Privacy Sandbox, which focuses on creating new privacy-preserving mechanisms for digital advertising.

    • Better Consent Experiences: Chrome is also expected to improve how websites prompt users to give consent for cookies, reducing “cookie fatigue” and making the process more straightforward.

    This new experience is expected to improve user privacy without entirely disrupting the ad-supported web ecosystem, which depends heavily on tracking technologies.

  • This situation does not affect google indexing, does it?

  • @cagatay Not to my knowledge.


Related Topics
  • Opening links in nodebb widget

    Solved Configure
    6
    4 Votes
    6 Posts
    374 Views

    A more efficient way of including this would be to not over complicate it and leverage a standard iframe (providing the CSP headers of the remote site permit this) like below

    <iframe src="https://www.classmarker.com/online-test/start/?quiz=gag66aea7922f0a5" width="700" height="800"></iframe>

    This works first time every time on your site as intended.

  • how to hide "moved" badge with CSS?

    Solved Customisation
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    517 Views

    @crazycells ah, I see. That makes sense.

  • 3 Votes
    5 Posts
    349 Views

    @crazycells Agreed. It takes a more sensible approach. Nobody ever upvotes the first post - it’s usually much further down as the conversation progresses.

  • www. Infront stops website access?

    Solved Configure
    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    476 Views

    @Panda because there is no match for the DNS entry specified. The receiving web server parses the headers looking for a destination hostname to match, and anything the web server is unable to resolve will be sent back to the root.

  • Removing blue 'moved' tag from post

    Solved Configure
    16
    3 Votes
    16 Posts
    744 Views

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • Theming support in Sudonix

    Moved Announcements
    41
    61 Votes
    41 Posts
    5k Views

    @phenomlab said in Theming support in Sudonix:

    I thought I’d better come by here with an update so everyone knows that the Swatch project isn’t abandoned, or has simply “gone cold”. In fact, quite the opposite.

    I’ve setup a dev instance on my home network which I’m currently developing against. I’ll put some screenshots up soon, but the Swatch code is currently enjoying a rewrite. The great news is that you’ll get ten times the flexibility you have now meaning greater support for light themes, although the downside is that there isn’t that much backwards compatibility meaning some of my own themes even need to be completely redesigned.

    However, this isn’t the end of the world. Once you’re familiar with the classes, it really doesn’t take long at all to create your own themes.

    More to follow.

    I’ll be putting together a video of what the revamped theme will look like very soon - just got some small issues to iron out, and code cleanup beforehand…

  • NodeBB metadata

    Solved Configure
    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    446 Views

    @phenomlab said in NodeBB metadata:

    @jac Are you sure ?

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Astockportcounty.fans&sxsrf=AOaemvLwnaZL-PliU_2dBOg_Eo1pMVhBjg%3A1638982328139&source=hp&ei=uOKwYeatBcOsad3yp7AE&iflsig=ALs-wAMAAAAAYbDwyLBSDcG5XYoFCKwQFhgz94wTxOcV&ved=0ahUKEwjm6dX71NT0AhVDVhoKHV35CUYQ4dUDCAk&uact=5&oq=site%3Astockportcounty.fans&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BAgjECc6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOg4ILhCABBCxAxDHARCjAjoRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQowI6BQguEIAEOggIABCABBCxAzoFCAAQgAQ6CAguELEDEIMBOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToICC4QgAQQsQM6BQgAELEDOgsILhCABBDHARDRAzoLCAAQgAQQsQMQyQM6BQgAEJIDUABYySZg0CdoAHAAeACAAW2IAa0NkgEEMjMuMpgBAKABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz

    Fair enough 🤪🤪😁.

  • Iframely (Nodebb)

    Solved Configure
    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    3k Views

    @DownPW This is now resolved. The issue was an incorrect URL specified in the Nodebb plugin. I’ve corrected this, and now it works as intended.