@phenomlab yes it’s a different theme. The other one was not offering much on editable sidebar. It was like flarum hahah
chat list navbar
-
@DownPW said in chat list navbar:
in fact I would like the menu not to overflow on the navbar because it was not the case before
Ah, that makes sense. You can probably do that with a simple
margin
CSS command. Is your test instance up ? -
@phenomlab yes
-
@phenomlab said in chat list navbar:
btn btn-secondary mark-all-read and btn btn-secondary mark-all-read:hover respectively
Not work with that for example:
.btn .btn-secondary .mark-all-read { color: red !important; } .btn .btn-secondary .mark-all-read:hover { background: #212427; color: #ccc !important; }
And
.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child), .btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child):telephone_receiver:
not too
-
@DownPW said in chat list navbar:
in fact I would like the menu not to overflow on the navbar because it was not the case before
That’s being caused by deliberate negative padding. This will fix it
.chat-list { margin-top: 0px; }
-
@DownPW said in chat list navbar:
Not work with that for example:
Seems to work for me on your site, but (sorry), it should be
a.btn .btn-secondary .mark-all-read
-
yeah great…
Can you test All chats button hover ?
Because.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child), .btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child):hover
not work -
@DownPW Works for me ?
-
Yeah good for “Mark all as read” but not All chats button:
@DownPW said in chat list navbar:
yeah great…
Can you test All chats button hover ?
Because.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child), .btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child):hover
not work -
@DownPW said in chat list navbar:
Yeah good for “Mark all as read” but not All chats button:
Yes, sadly, that element is in use in several other places. You could target it directly, but it will also mean changing it in multiple places which won’t be the desired effect. The most effective way would be to target a
div
ID, but you’d need something likejQuery
to target that specific element and add an ID to it. -
hmm hard for just an effect.
It’s a problem for my dark themesIn sudonix I see this :
and Hover:
I think it’s a better way, how achieve this effect (with different color) ?
-
@DownPW Ah, yes, I remember this one now - it was a nightmare to target, and I landed up using the pseudo class which unfortunately does include the border, but it’s subtle enough to still look good
Try this
.btn-group.btn-group-justified:hover { /* Your css here */ }
-
I resolve with this
.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child), .btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child) { color: #ccc; } a.btn.btn-secondary:hover { color: #ccc; background: #212427; } .caret { color: #000; } a.btn.btn-secondary.mark-all-read { color: #ccc !important; } a.btn.btn-secondary.mark-all-read:hover { background: #212427; color: #ccc !important; }
-
-
I have a problem on my themes.
Example I Have this on my css files :
.btn-group>.btn:last-child:not(:first-child), .btn-group>.dropdown-toggle:not(:first-child) { color: var(--first-color) !important; }
But this code is not taken into account
if i change in dev console (in live) it’s ok
Can you help me with that ?
-
Maybe a problem with theme switcher & nodeBB 3.2.1 ?
-
@DownPW no, this works independently of NodeBB as it uses jQuery and CSS. The issue you have is the below
var(--first-color)
In CSS,
var
is a variable defined atroot
level and probably doesn’t exist in your CSS file. Essentially, it’s LESS. If you change the line so it looks (for example) like the below, it will probably then work#ffffff;
The newer version of the theme switcher uses LESS variables as it’s more efficient but if these don’t exist then it looks like it’s being ignored when I’m fact it just returns a null value.
-
yes i know for var all the theme is coded with var.
It’s the same things with #XXXXXX
-
@DownPW this sounds more like a caching issue to me. Do you get the same thing in an incognito session ?
-
@phenomlab said in chat list navbar:
@DownPW this sounds more like a caching issue to me. Do you get the same thing in an incognito session ?
yes
-
I just installed firefox and it’s the same so for me it’s not a cache problem
Edit @phenomlab
For example, in fortifem theme, the code is correctly interpreted but not on Nightprowler theme but the code is the same !
Fortifem its’ ok :
https://i.imgur.com/Y85sVBi.gifNight prowler is not Ok withe the same code as Fortifem (variable) :
https://i.imgur.com/tWus88b.gif
All the rest of theme is OK
-
@DownPW I’ll have a look at this tomorrow. Sounds like you have values being overridden somewhere
Did this solution help you?
Related Topics
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fontawesome 5
Unsolved Customisation -
-
Bug Navbar CSS
Solved Customisation