Skip to content
Sudonix

Modify the tagging behavior in NodeBB

Locked General

Related Topics
  • Madchatthewundefined

    TNG + Nodebb

    General
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    129 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Madchatthew said in TNG + Nodebb:

    you have to try and use duck tape and super glue to change something to make it do what you want it to do

    I couldn’t have put that better myself.

  • Pandaundefined

    Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    282 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • dave1904undefined

    nodebb-plugin-reactions not working @v1.0.2 with Harmony theme

    Solved General
    47
    12 Votes
    47 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @dave1904 just coming back to this thread as @DownPW and I both experienced issues with other plugins today, and the fix was to use the plugin ordering in the ACP and move the Harmony theme to the very top so it comes before everything else in terms of other plugins.

    It might be worth at least trying this to see if it gives you a result rather than the previous bulldozer approach. Thinking about it, the previous fix I proposed is along the same lines and disabling plugins does in fact change the order when they are enabled again, so this is definitely worth a try.

    Let me know how you get on.

  • phenomlabundefined

    Welcome to NodeBB V3!

    Pinned Moved General
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    240 Views
    No one has replied
  • phenomlabundefined

    v3 & Harmony diary / thoughts / code snippets

    Announcements
    55
    36 Votes
    55 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW I see why. The code relies on the existence of

    [component="topic/quickreply/container"]

    However, this by definition means that the below has to be enabled

    aeef638f-4188-489d-a9f2-f3a26dbca9d8-image.png

    It will then work

    7fb38631-e0f3-46ef-b652-00929d927b13-image.png

    For some unknown reason, this is hidden in Harmony, and only shows if you select it. In v2, it seems that the <section> is deleted altogether in Persona if “Quick Reply” is disabled, meaning it won’t fire as it can’t locate that specific component.

    The downside is that you might not want the quick reply function, but I think it’s a PITA to scroll up to the top of the post just to reply, so I have it on 🙂

  • cagatayundefined

    Issues with 2nd NodeBB installation

    Solved General
    22
    3 Votes
    22 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @cagatay yes, that will be fine. Just watch for potential caching conflicts as you will have two sites writing to the one instance of iframely.

  • qwinterundefined

    Discourse can turn posts into wiki posts. Can nodeBB?

    General
    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    410 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @qwinter it’s workable I think, but not perfect - then again, unless you write a specific plugin to perform such a task, what is. As you pointed out, you have versioning of sorts with the historical access to reach post.

  • JACundefined

    NodeBB - Created pages not found?

    General
    20
    3 Votes
    20 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @jac Exactly. Hard point to argue.