Skip to content

NodeBB v4.0.0

General
28 4 8.1k 1
  • wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Yes, I can see these while on your site, and I created the topic from your site in the World category. However, I should also be able to see the links on my own site or the NodeBB site, but I can’t, even though I am following you.

  • Yes, I can see these while on your site, and I created the topic from your site in the World category. However, I should also be able to see the links on my own site or the NodeBB site, but I can’t, even though I am following you.

    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @cagatay Yes, exactly that.

  • wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Since we are following each other, we can see the messages we post in Julian’s topic as cagatay@community.nodebb.org. However, we cannot see messages from others because we are not following them on their own sites, or maybe we need to follow them on nodebb.org—I’m not sure. After all, we are unable to create topics ourselves, right?

  • wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @phenomlab pleased (and a little surprised) to see you embracing Federation.
    You didn’t seem to be a fan last time we discussed it, what has given you the change of heart? 🙂

  • @phenomlab pleased (and a little surprised) to see you embracing Federation.
    You didn’t seem to be a fan last time we discussed it, what has given you the change of heart? 🙂

    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @Panda I’m not embracing it as such - more along the lines of early testing to see if there is any benefit to the Sudonix community as a whole.

  • wrote on last edited by Panda
    #24

    I hope you stay on board with the ActivityPub because there is stuff that need fixing / improving. As I said some months ago, your input on some of those issues will be value.
    Its a very complex area.

  • wrote on last edited by DownPW
    #25

    Personally, I don’t really like this feature in principle.

    Besides, I don’t know how it works and I don’t feel like it was presented well.

    Then, I would like to keep control of what is shared elsewhere than on my site.

  • Personally, I don’t really like this feature in principle.

    Besides, I don’t know how it works and I don’t feel like it was presented well.

    Then, I would like to keep control of what is shared elsewhere than on my site.

    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @DownPW agreed. I too am approaching this with trepidation rather than simply throwing myself into it. I understand the appeal and potential for a wider audience, but given the remit of this site and the mission that Sudonix effectively promotes, I’m not sure it’s a good fit.

  • wrote on last edited by Panda
    #27

    @DownPW In principle I like the feature.
    However you maybe right that it hasn’t been presented well, which matters since the workings of World aren’t intuitive
    Its not easy to get World populating when a forum is new to it. Further more World doesnt populate for new users either, even if the forum has connections.

    If forums started out with a set of connections, and new users also started off with a default set of those connections, it might help having something in there!.

  • @DownPW In principle I like the feature.
    However you maybe right that it hasn’t been presented well, which matters since the workings of World aren’t intuitive
    Its not easy to get World populating when a forum is new to it. Further more World doesnt populate for new users either, even if the forum has connections.

    If forums started out with a set of connections, and new users also started off with a default set of those connections, it might help having something in there!.

    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @Panda said in NodeBB v4.0.0:

    the workings of World aren’t intuitive
    Its not easy to get World populating when a forum is new to it

    This is a good point and one I’ve considered also. It’s a little confusing to be honest.


Related Topics
  • TNG + Nodebb

    General tng genealogy nodebb plugin
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Madchatthew said in TNG + Nodebb: you have to try and use duck tape and super glue to change something to make it do what you want it to do I couldn’t have put that better myself.
  • Nodebb design

    Solved General nodebb
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Nodebb design: One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum. From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over. @Panda said in Nodebb design: The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions. This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write. A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase. You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.
  • Nodebb 3.2.0

    Bugs nodebb nodebb 3.2.0
    20
    1
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    7k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells yes, I’m aware of that. Need to fix EDIT- fixed. Caused by the same CSS that is used to absolutely position the “verified” group badge in the posts view. Amended this CSS so that is specifically targets the post stream as below li[component="post"] a[href*="/groups/verified"] { position: absolute !important; left: 8px; z-index: 2; margin-top: 1px; border-radius: 999px !important; line-height: 14px; display: block; height: 22px; margin-left: 0px !important; }
  • 4 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    @Panda said in Upgrade to NodeBB v3? 2BB or not 2BB, that is the question!: So although thats a plugin it has Widget like element and stopped working on the Theme change Which is normal based on the widgets being reset when you change themes.
  • NodeBB: Privileges for the Announcement channel

    Solved Configure nodebb
    6
    1
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlab
    Up to you really
  • Chevron up before & after

    Solved Configure nodebb
    11
    1
    4 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    cagatay
    @crazycells you are right thank you.
  • Issues with 2nd NodeBB installation

    Solved General
    22
    3 Votes
    22 Posts
    10k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay yes, that will be fine. Just watch for potential caching conflicts as you will have two sites writing to the one instance of iframely.
  • Adding fileWrite to nodebb code

    Solved Configure nodebb
    16
    1
    5 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @eveh this might be a question for the NodeBB Devs themselves. In all honesty, I’m not entirely sure without having to research this myself.