Facebook goes offline ๐คญ
General
Posts
51
Posts
Posters
4
Posters
Views
5.1k
Views
Watching
1
Watching
-
With Facebook, WhatsApp and other dodgy social networks down users have flocked to Sudonix for some general honest chat
.@jac haha
yep, they are down indeed. -
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac haha
yep, they are down indeed.Without reading into the facts have they been hacked?
-
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac haha
yep, they are down indeed.Without reading into the facts have they been hacked?
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
-
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Wow
. -
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Wow
. -
@jac Facebook is โgoneโ. Letโs hope it stays that way
-
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac Facebook is โgoneโ. Letโs hope it stays that way
-
@phenomlab said in Users flock to Sudonix:
@jac Facebook is โgoneโ. Letโs hope it stays that way
-
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Their DNS was/is horked up. I presumed theyโre DNS admins had royally shot themselves in the foot. But maybe they just pointed stuff to localhost as a way to keep folks from hitting their fubarโd site.
In any event, hopefully the internet gods that be will give 'em the grand spanking they deserve!
-
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac https://hostrisk.com/topic/1297/facebook-instagram-whatsapp-suffer-widespread-outage
Very good that at the bottom, keep you out of trouble.
-
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Their DNS was/is horked up. I presumed theyโre DNS admins had royally shot themselves in the foot. But maybe they just pointed stuff to localhost as a way to keep folks from hitting their fubarโd site.
In any event, hopefully the internet gods that be will give 'em the grand spanking they deserve!
@gotwf said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Their DNS was/is horked up. I presumed theyโre DNS admins had royally shot themselves in the foot. But maybe they just pointed stuff to localhost as a way to keep folks from hitting their fubarโd site.
In any event, hopefully the internet gods that be will give 'em the grand spanking they deserve!
I only use it now and again to keep in touch with distant family but I couldnโt care less if it disappeared and never came back.
-
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac https://hostrisk.com/topic/1297/facebook-instagram-whatsapp-suffer-widespread-outage
Very good that at the bottom, keep you out of trouble.
@jac Exactly that. Itโs the signature facility in core slightly modified to suit.
-
@gotwf said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac I doubt it. Itโs probably due to a deployed fix not working as intended and failing regression testing or a third party service developing a fault.
Their DNS was/is horked up. I presumed theyโre DNS admins had royally shot themselves in the foot. But maybe they just pointed stuff to localhost as a way to keep folks from hitting their fubarโd site.
In any event, hopefully the internet gods that be will give 'em the grand spanking they deserve!
I only use it now and again to keep in touch with distant family but I couldnโt care less if it disappeared and never came back.
@jac Me neither.
-
@jac Exactly that. Itโs the signature facility in core slightly modified to suit.
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac Exactly that. Itโs the signature facility in core slightly modified to suit.
I think you may have replied in the wrong thread mate, but it definitely looks great and letโs everyone know who the content belongs to. Great idea
-
@phenomlab said in Facebook goes offline ๐คญ:
@jac Exactly that. Itโs the signature facility in core slightly modified to suit.
I think you may have replied in the wrong thread mate, but it definitely looks great and letโs everyone know who the content belongs to. Great idea
@jac Nope. I didnโt
-
-
Thinking about this a bit further it occurs to me that the DNS was likely purposefully pointed to localhost so as to keep billions of users experiencing dopamine withdrawals from bombarding fb every few minutes whilst they scrambled to fix whatever. And were I a betting man, Iโd say odds are they got hacked again. Going to be interesting to see how they spin doctor this one.
Opinionated two bit opinions are my own. Caveat emptor, eh?
-
Thinking about this a bit further it occurs to me that the DNS was likely purposefully pointed to localhost so as to keep billions of users experiencing dopamine withdrawals from bombarding fb every few minutes whilst they scrambled to fix whatever. And were I a betting man, Iโd say odds are they got hacked again. Going to be interesting to see how they spin doctor this one.
@gotwf A bit more (perhaps) spin on this from SKY News
My 2c here is that this could well have been a DDoS attack from an entity like Anonymous in response to the Whistleblowing claims mentioned in this article
-
@gotwf A bit more (perhaps) spin on this from SKY News
My 2c here is that this could well have been a DDoS attack from an entity like Anonymous in response to the Whistleblowing claims mentioned in this article
@phenomlab Meh, you ainโt seen nothinโ yetโฆ Todayโs testimony, which I watched live, is tame as a newborn puppy. Comparatively. Check this out. If youโve the stomach. Be forewarned, some some sick 'chit crosses the โcontent analystsโ desks
Facebook Whistleblower Reveals Censorship Guidelines for Moderators - WARNING
I donโt know what is going on w/my browser, but the link above fails to display. @phenomlab, feel free to edit this post as necessary to make it so. Gotta run.
Opinionated two bit opinions are my own. Caveat emptor, eh?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (ether email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks, use reactions, and upvote to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
RegisterLog in
