Skip to content
Sudonix

DNS record invalid (Google webmaster)

Solved Hosting

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

Related Topics
  • Pandaundefined

    Is no cpanel on host normal?

    Solved Hosting
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    519 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda if just seems bizarre practice to me. They clearly state that cPanel comes with the package, yet don’t seem to offer it unless you complain it’s missing!

  • DownPWundefined

    Nginx core developer quits project in security dispute, starts “freenginx” fork

    Hosting
    6
    3 Votes
    6 Posts
    579 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW said in Nginx core developer quits project in security dispute, starts “freenginx” fork:

    Maybe virtualmin implement it in the future…

    I don’t think they will - my guess is that they will stick with the current branch of NGINX. I’ve not personally tested it, but the GIT page seems to be very active. This is equally impressive

    8ac0d197-68fa-4bd8-bfa3-87237bf8f1f4-image.png

    I think the most impressive on here is the native support of HTTP 3

  • Pandaundefined

    Is nginx necessary to use?

    Moved Solved Hosting
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    373 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search:

    Basic question again, is nginx necessary to use?

    No, but you’d need something at least to handle the inbound requests, so you could use Apache, NGINX, Caddy… (there are plenty of them, but I tend to prefer NGINX)

    @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search:

    Do these two sites need to be attached to different ports, and the ports put in the DNS record?

    No. They will both use ports 80 (HTTP) and 443 (HTTPS) by default.

    @Panda said in Cloudflare bot fight mode and Google search:

    Its not currently working, but how would the domain name know which of the two sites to resolve to without more info?
    Currently it only says the IP of the whole server.

    Yes, that’s correct. Domain routing is handled (for example) at the NGINX level, so whatever you have in DNS will be presented as the hostname, and NGINX will expect a match which once received, will then be forwarded onto the relevant destination.

    As an example, in your NGINX config, you could have (at a basic level used in reverse proxy mode - obviously, the IP addresses here are redacted and replaced with fakes). We assume you have created an A record in your DNS called “proxy” which resolves to 192.206.28.1, so fully qualified, will be proxy.sudonix.org in this case.

    The web browser requests this site, which is in turn received by NGINX and matches the below config

    server { server_name proxy.sudonix.org; listen 192.206.28.1; root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy; index index.php index.htm index.html; access_log /var/log/virtualmin/proxy.sudonix.org_access_log; error_log /var/log/virtualmin/proxy.sudonix.org_error_log; location / { proxy_set_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin *; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_pass http://localhost:2000; proxy_redirect off; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Api-Key $http_x_api_key; } location /images { index index.php index.htm index.html; root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy; } fastcgi_split_path_info "^(.+\.php)(/.+)$"; listen 192.206.28.1:443 ssl http2; ssl_certificate /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ssl.combined; ssl_certificate_key /home/sudonix.org/ssl.key; }

    The important part here is server_name proxy.sudonix.org; as this is used to “map” the request to the actual domain name, which you can see in the root section as root /home/sudonix.org/domains/proxy.sudonix.org/ogproxy;

    As the DNS record you specified matches this hostname, NGINX then knows what to do with the request when it receives it.

  • Madchatthewundefined

    VPS Provider

    Solved Hosting
    7
    6 Votes
    7 Posts
    355 Views
    Madchatthewundefined

    @phenomlab thank you very much. I will use that link when I set up my new server.

    Thanks again!

  • JACundefined

    Domain name factors

    Hosting
    16
    1 Votes
    16 Posts
    872 Views
    JACundefined

    @phenomlab said in Domain name factors:

    @jac Yes, but don’t forget that Matomo (and most browsers) alike will allow you to “opt out” or not be tracked, so you can’t really rely on these 100%.

    Absolutely, very true pal.

  • JACundefined

    Site down

    Solved Hosting
    9
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    487 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @jac thinking about it, this is probably related to the feature in Nord VPN.
    https://nordvpn.com/features/vpn-kill-switch/

  • Madchatthewundefined

    Virtualmin Letsencrypt Renewal

    Solved Hosting
    13
    1 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @gotwf said in Virtualmin Letsencrypt Renewal:

    I favor KISS engineering

    Then I think you’ll be able to appreciate this
    https://content.sudonix.com/keep-it-simple-stupid/

  • phenomlabundefined

    Hetzner - great for hosting. Terrible for support

    Hosting
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    553 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @cagatay same here. Was previously an IONOS user, but moved to Hetzner to realise both savings and performance increase and have never looked back.