Skip to content

Widget | CSS customization

Solved WordPress
53 2 19.3k 1
  • @phenomlab 480*360 its being read from the ytimage so it could be a background img? I have attempted to apply the last css 2 mins ago, and it did not work

    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @Sala Works for me - are you testing this on a desktop? The mobile CSS is a different class

    38198d2b-8636-4419-ada2-c92056ede95c-image.png

  • @Sala Works for me - are you testing this on a desktop? The mobile CSS is a different class

    38198d2b-8636-4419-ada2-c92056ede95c-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @phenomlab i am refreshing the view:source url using mobile, please let me have the class for mobile, i apply

  • @phenomlab i am refreshing the view:source url using mobile, please let me have the class for mobile, i apply

    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @Sala In mobile view, it looks fine already

    7b1e88df-e6b9-4862-9f4f-8620ef4328ce-image.png

  • @Sala In mobile view, it looks fine already

    7b1e88df-e6b9-4862-9f4f-8620ef4328ce-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @phenomlab surprisingly on source code the yt thumbnail is still width=“480” height=“360”

  • @phenomlab surprisingly on source code the yt thumbnail is still width=“480” height=“360”

    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @Sala No, it isn’t

    f972f4cd-f3f0-467e-a825-ef0d62213391-image.png

  • @Sala No, it isn’t

    f972f4cd-f3f0-467e-a825-ef0d62213391-image.png

    wrote on last edited by
    #37
  • wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @Sala Those are just placeholders and inherited from the iframe embed. If you change those values, nothing will happen.

  • @Sala Those are just placeholders and inherited from the iframe embed. If you change those values, nothing will happen.

    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @phenomlab you know the current yt video size is 400 * 225, on that line at the end of that code and still its reported to be very tall. So these placeholders could be the culprit

  • @phenomlab you know the current yt video size is 400 * 225, on that line at the end of that code and still its reported to be very tall. So these placeholders could be the culprit

    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

  • @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @phenomlab we are called off for supper, will attempt to check using that, the browser would have to start a fresh. Catch up on later. Many thanks bdw

  • @Sala What do you get if you try in incognito? It works fine for me.

    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @phenomlab i also believe the video is okay, though the report is still unclear.

    Is this a video issue or its the article image?
    alt text

  • @phenomlab i also believe the video is okay, though the report is still unclear.

    Is this a video issue or its the article image?
    alt text

    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @Sala That’s telling you that the video is too tall, and doesn’t meet Google’s criteria. You should remove the CSS below and be more specific with image sizes

    div.text img {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
    }
    

    You are targeting all img tags with this CSS, which is less than desirable. Let’s first remove this CSS and see if that resolves the Google crawl issue which I’m confident it will.

  • @Sala That’s telling you that the video is too tall, and doesn’t meet Google’s criteria. You should remove the CSS below and be more specific with image sizes

    div.text img {
        width: 100%;
        height: 315px;
    }
    

    You are targeting all img tags with this CSS, which is less than desirable. Let’s first remove this CSS and see if that resolves the Google crawl issue which I’m confident it will.

    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @phenomlab sure, let me compose myself, because the css currently is wrapped up. But, what of the height if we remove its going to use the image height which sometime back i saw them occupying a large space.

    div.text is affecting even yt video d**n, that brings up the picture 👍

  • @phenomlab sure, let me compose myself, because the css currently is wrapped up. But, what of the height if we remove its going to use the image height which sometime back i saw them occupying a large space.

    div.text is affecting even yt video d**n, that brings up the picture 👍

    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    @Sala it will affect that because you are targeting all img elements - this is why I said to remove that CSS block

  • @Sala it will affect that because you are targeting all img elements - this is why I said to remove that CSS block

    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    @phenomlab On it sir

  • @Sala it will affect that because you are targeting all img elements - this is why I said to remove that CSS block

    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @phenomlab done, its resubmitted on google. I am composing another article so we can clarify if that was the problem. Talk to you later

  • @phenomlab done, its resubmitted on google. I am composing another article so we can clarify if that was the problem. Talk to you later

    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @Sala Ok. Keep me posted.

  • @Sala Ok. Keep me posted.

    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @phenomlab new article has been index though we have the same issue. At least not from article image, this time its the image from the video?
    alt text

  • @phenomlab new article has been index though we have the same issue. At least not from article image, this time its the image from the video?
    alt text

    wrote on last edited by
    #50
  • wrote on last edited by Sala
    #51

    @phenomlab Hi, thanks for the additional info, it would help people online by comparing. For us we finally found a solution fixing the videos totally in a different way. It was detailed with one of our member. It appears that google has made some changes over these recent days. We’re formulating a plan on how we would save old and future articles. It has been a joy though hell of a ride.


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Support 💗 Sudonix with a coffee ☕
If your organisation needs deeper expertise around infrastructure, security, or technology leadership, learn more about Phenomlab Ltd. Many of the deeper technical guides behind Sudonix are published there.

Related Topics
  • Switch between list and card view function

    Moved Let's Build It cards layout css
    107
    1
    50 Votes
    107 Posts
    58k Views
    phenomlab
    @crazycells [image: image.png] [image: image.png]
  • Fixing YouTube videos css

    Solved WordPress css
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    Sala
    @phenomlab It looks good, but not anymore. I’ve already lost so much time. Now it’s time to move on
  • The best css to customize our logo?

    Solved Customisation css
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    phenomlab
    @Sala This should look better .sidenav .navbar-brand { padding-top: 0.5rem; padding-bottom: 0.5rem; } [image: e5cec20e-be36-4ee8-9129-fd11ad4656ac-image.png] You can increase the top and bottom padding by increasing the values above.
  • Quote design CSS

    Solved Customisation css quote
    15
    1
    4 Votes
    15 Posts
    6k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW yes, that does make sense actually. I forgot to mention the layout of Sudonix is custom so that would have an impact on the positioning. Good spot
  • Bottom footer navbar button extend

    Solved Customisation css javascript customisation footer navbar
    32
    9 Votes
    32 Posts
    16k Views
    phenomlab
    @DownPW said in Bottom footer navbar button extend: Oh my god, it’s beautiful mark I liked this design so much, I’ve implemented it here. I intend to do a lot more with the footer in due course, so hiding it makes a lot of sense. Thanks @DownPW for the idea and initial concept
  • tag icon in front of tags

    Solved Customisation css
    5
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    crazycells
    @phenomlab said in tag icon in front of tags: @crazycells Are you using Font Awesome Free ? If so, try this span.tag:before { content: "\f02b"; font-family: "Font Awesome 5 Free"; margin-right: 5px; margin-left: 5px; font-weight: 900; } yeap, this worked thanks a lot.
  • [NodeBB] Import custom Font

    Solved Customisation custom fonts nodebb css
    12
    3 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    phenomlab
    @cagatay you’ll need to define this in the body tag (or another element if you want greater or more granular targets) - for example body { font-family: "Poppins"; font-size: 16px; } Essentially, you use the font-size CSS directive.
  • Multiple link on one ico non Navbar

    Solved Customisation links css navbar
    7
    1
    2 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPW
    yeah you’re right @phenomlab. Problem of NodeBB Version